mw. dr. D.M. (Dorota) Mokrosinska


  • Faculteit der Geesteswetenschappen
    Capaciteitsgroep Philosophy and Public Affairs
  • Oude Turfmarkt  141
    1012 GC  Amsterdam
    Kamernummer: 301A
  • D.M.Mokrosinska@uva.nl

DOROTA MOKROSIŃSKA works as a Research Fellow in Philosophy at the University of Amsterdam, The Netherlands.  She holds an MA in sociology from the University of Warsaw, Poland and a PhD in philosophy ( cum laude ) from the University of Amsterdam. Her dissertation won the 2008 National Biennal Dissertation Prize awarded by the Dutch Research School in Ethics.  With a prestigious grant from the Netherlands Organization for Scientific Research, she spent time as a Visiting Scholar at University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill. In Spring/Summer 2013 she was a Departmental Guest at the Department of Politics at Princeton University.

 

From September 2014, dr. Mokrosinska will be taking a position at the Department of Political Science of the Goethe University in Frankfurt am Main, Germany.

RESEARCH

 

Dr. Mokrosinska's research is primarily in political philosophy and ethics with special interest in political authority, state legitimacy, political obligation and issues related to individual privacy, secrecy and transparency in politics. At present, she is conducting research on the social value of privacy funded by the Netherlands Organisation for Scientific Research. Dr. Mokrosinska is editor (with B. Roessler) of the volume Social Dimensions of Privacy: Interdisciplinary Perspectives, Cambridge University Press (forthcoming, 2014).

 

Dr. Mokrosinska is author of  Rethinking Political Obligation. Moral Principles, Communal Ties, Citizenship (Palgrave Macmillan, 2012).

The book presents a fresh analysis of the most influential theories of political obligation and develops a novel approach to this foundational problem of political philosophy. The theory of political obligation developed in the book extends the scope of the contemporary debate on political obligation by arguing that political obligation can be binding even under the jurisdiction of unjust states. The arguments pursued in the book are illustrated with the results of sociological research concerning the reasons that governed people's attitudes to the authoritarian communist regimes in East Europe viz. communist Poland. The book provides the first detailed argument of how a theory of political obligation can apply to subjects of an unjust state.

BOOKS

1.  Rethinking Political Obligation. Moral Principles, Communal Ties, Citizenship, Palgrave Macmillan, 2012

-       Nominated for the Book Award 2013 by the Amsterdam School for Cultural Analysis (ASCA)

-       Reviewed in Algemeen Nederlands Tijdschrift voor Wijsbegeerte

 2.    [Political Obligation, PhD dissertation, Department of Philosophy, University of Amsterdam, 2007]

 

EDITED VOLUME

1.   Social Dimensions of Privacy: Interdisciplinary Perspectives (co-edited with B. Roessler), Cambridge University Press (forthcoming 2014)

 

BOOK CHAPTERS

1.  “How Much Privacy for Public Officials?” in: B. Roessler and D. Mokrosinska, Social Dimensions of Privacy: Interdisciplinary Perspectives, Cambridge University Press (forthcoming 2014)

2.    “Social Dimensions of Privacy: Introduction” (with. B. Roessler), in: B. Roessler and D. Mokrosinska, Social Dimensions of Privacy: Interdisciplinary Perspectives, Cambridge University Press (forthcoming 2014)

3.    “Why States Have No Right to Privacy, But May be Entitled to Secrecy”, commissioned for: Political Ethics, eds. E. Crookston, J. Trerise and D. Killoren (under negotiation with a university press)

 

ARTICLES

1.    “Privacy and the Integrity of Liberal Politics: The Case of Governmental Internet Searches”, Journal of Social Philosophy (forthcoming 2014)

2. “The Value and Meaning of Privacy in Modern Democracies. Review of Lever ‘On Privacy’”, commissioned by Ethical Theory and Moral Practice (forthcoming 2014)

3.    “Communal Ties and Political Obligation”, Ratio Juris 26 (2) 2013: 187-214

4.  “What is Political about Political Obligation? A Neglected Lesson from Consent Theory”, Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy 16 (2013): 88-108

5.   “Privacy and Social Interaction” (with B. Roessler), Philosophy and Social Criticism 39 (8) 2013: 771-791

6.  "Soziale Dimensionen des Privaten", B. Rössler & D. Mokrosinska, Politische Vierteljahresschrift 2012.

7.   “Privatheit im Internet. Eine liberale Analyse”, juridikum. zeitschrift für kritik | recht | gesellschaft 4 (2011): 500-517

8.    “Het gemeenschapskarakter van politieke verplichtingen”, Tijdschrift voor Filosofie 72 (2010): 717-747

9.    “Wat is er Politiek aan Politieke Verplichtingen? Een Vergeten Kwestie in het Debat”, in: Als Vuur Verbeek, B.J.E., Wijsbek. H., & van Donselaar, G. (eds.), Boom Juridisch Press 2008, pp. 73-91

10.   “From Natural Duties to Political Obligation: a Problematic Passage”, Rechtstheorie 21 (2005): 95-105

 

TEACHING

Privacy: Moral, Social, Legal Problems

Political Obligation

Introduction to Ethics

Legitimacy of the State

Ethics and Integrity

Morals and Politics

2012

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2005

  • D.M. Mokrosinska (2005). From Natural Duties to Political Obligation: a Problematic Passage. Rechtstheorie, 21, 95-105.

2009

  • D. Mokrosinska (2009). Wat is er politiek aan politieke verplichtingen? Een vergeten kwestie in het debat. In P. Rijpkema, G. van Donselaar, B. Verbeek & H. Wijsbek (Eds.), Als vuur: opstellen voor Govert den Hartogh ter gelegenheid van zijn emeritaat (pp. 73-90). Den Haag: Boom Juridische Uitgevers.
This page has been automatically generated by the UvA-Current Research Information System. If you have any questions about the content of this page, please contact the UBAcoach or the Metis staff of your faculty / institute. To edit your publications login to Personal Metis.

Geen nevenwerkzaamheden bekend

bewerk