dr. E.T. (Eveline) Feteris

List

Faculty of Humanities
Capaciteitsgroep Taalbeheersing, Argumentatietheorie en Retorica
Spuistraat 134
1012 VB Amsterdam
E.T.Feteris@uva.nl
T: 0205254705
T: 0205254716

Publications
Ancillary activities

refereed(40)
academic(7)

2013

E.T. Feteris (2013). An argumentative approach to the burden of proof in legal and non-legal discussions. Explorations in Language and Law (NOVAlogos), 1 (1), 23-42.
E.T. Feteris (2013). The use of allusions to literary and cultural sources in argumentation in political cartoons. In H. Belle, P. Gillaerts, B. Gorp, van, D. Mieroop, van de & K. Rutten (Eds.), Verbal and visual rhetoric in a media world (pp. 415-428). Amsterdam: Leiden University Press.
E.T. Feteris (2013). Strategic maneuvering with the argumentative role of legal principles in the case of the ‘Unworthy Spouse’. In C. Dahlman & E. Feteris (Eds.), Legal argumentation theory: cross-disciplinary perspectives Vol. 102. Law and Philosophy Library (pp. 85-101). Dordrecht: Springer.

2012

E.T. Feteris (2012). Strategisch manoeuvreren in politieke cartoons met een visuele scenariometafoor. Tijdschrift voor Taalbeheersing, 34 (3), 199-212.
E.T. Feteris (2012). Strategic maneuvoeuvring with linguistic arguments in legal decisions: a disputable literal reading of the law. International Journal of Law, Language & Discourse, 2 (1), 106-125.
E.T. Feteris (2012). Strategic manoeuvring in the case of the 'Unworthy spouse'. In F.H. van Eemeren & B. Garssen (Eds.), Exploring argumentative contexts (Argumentation in context, 4) (pp. 149-164). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
E. Feteris & H. Kloosterhuis (2012). Een pragma-dialectische analyse van juridische argumentatie als onderdeel van een kritische discussie. In E.T. Feteris, H. Kloosterhuis, H.J. Plug, J.A. Pontier & C.E. Smith (Eds.), Gewogen oordelen: essays over argumentatie en recht: bijdragen aan het Zesde Symposium Juridische Argumentatie 24 juni 2011 (pp. 253-262). Den Haag: Boom.
E. Feteris (2012). The study of legal argumentation in argumentation theory and legal theory: approaches and developments. Cogency, 3 (2), 11-32.
E.T. Feteris (2012). The role of the judge in legal proceedings: a pragma-dialectical analysis. Journal of Argumentation in Context, 1 (2), 234-252. doi: 10.1075/jaic.1.2.05fet
H. Kloosterhuis & E. Feteris (2012). De Rule of Law en het recht als argumentatieve praktijk. In E.T. Feteris, H. Kloosterhuis, H.J. Plug, J.A. Pontier & C.E. Smith (Eds.), Gewogen oordelen: essays over argumentatie en recht: bijdragen aan het Zesde Symposium Juridische Argumentatie 24 juni 2011 (pp. 243-252). Den Haag: Boom.

2011

E. Feteris (2011). Strategic maneuvering with linguistic arguments in the justification of judicial decisions. In T. van Haaften, H. Jansen, J. de Jong & W. Koetsenruijter (Eds.), Bending opinion: essays on persuasion in the public domain (pp. 423-439). Leiden: Leiden University Press.
E. Feteris & H. Kloosterhuis (2011). Law and argumentation theory: theoretical approaches to legal justification. In B. van Klink & S. Taekema (Eds.), Law and method: interdisciplinary research into law (Politika, 4) (pp. 253-273). Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck.
E.T. Feteris (2011). Strategic Manoeuvring in the Case of the ‘Unworthy Spouse’. In F.H. Eemeren, B. Garssen, D. Godden & G. Mitchell (Eds.), Proceedings of the 7th Conference of the International Society for the Study of Argumentation (pp. 448-460). Amsterdam: Rosenberg/Sic Sat.
E. Feteris, L. Groarke & J. Plug (2011). Strategic maneuvering with visual arguments in political cartoons: a pragma-dialectical analysis of the use of topoi that are based on common cultural heritage. In E. Feteris, B. Garssen & F. Snoeck Henkemans (Eds.), Keeping in touch with pragma-dialectics: in honor of Frans H. van Eemeren (pp. 59-74). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.

2010

E.T. Feteris (2010). De hoge raad kiest de veilige weg: een pragma-dialectische analyse van het strategisch manoeuvreren in de zaak van de onwaardige deelgenoot. Tijdschrift voor Taalbeheersing, 32 (1), 1-22.
E.T. Feteris (2010). The allocation of the burden of proof in mixed disputes in legal and non-legal contexts. Cogency, 2 (1), 35-55.

2009

E.T. Feteris (2009). Strategisch manoeuvreren met taalkundige argumentatie in een redelijke juridische discussie. In W. Spooren, M. Onrust & J. Sanders (Eds.), Studies in taalbeheersing 3 (pp. 63-72). Assen: Van Gorcum.
E. Feteris (2009). Strategic manoeuvres with linguistic arguments in legal decisions. In E.T. Feteris, H. Kloosterhuis & H.J. Plug (Eds.), Argumentation and the application of legal rules (pp. 55-73). Amsterdam: Sic Sat / Rozenberg.
E. Feteris (2009). Strategic manoeuvring with linguistic arguments in the justification of legal decisions. In J. Ritola (Ed.), Argument cultures: proceedings of OSSA '09. Windsor, ON: Ontario Society for the Study of Argumentation.
E.T. Feteris (2009). The role of arguments from reasonableness in the justification of judicial decisions. Studies in Communication Sciences, 9 (2), 93-111.
E.T. Feteris (2009). Taalkundige argumentatie in een redelijke juridische discussie: aanvaardbare en onaanvaardbare vormen van strategisch manoeuvreren. Rechtsgeleerd Magazijn Themis, 2009 (2), 79-85.
E.T. Feteris (2009). Strategic manoeuvring in the justification of judicial decisions. In F. van Eemeren (Ed.), Examining argumentation in context: fifteen studies on strategic maneuvering (Argumentation in context, 1) (pp. 93-114). Amsterdam: Benjamins.
E. Feteris & H. Kloosterhuis (2009). The analysis and evaluation of legal argumentation: approaches from legal theory and argumentation theory. Studies in Logic, Grammar and Rhetoric, 16 (29), 307-331.

2008

E.T. Feteris (2008). A normative reconstruction of arguments from reasonableness in the justification of judicial decisions. In T. Dubrovskaya & Y.V. Kitayeva (Eds.), Modern developments in linguistics and language teaching: II international conference proceedings, Moscow-Penza, 28-30 april 2008 = Sovremennye napravlenija v lingvistike i prepodavanii jazykov: materialy II meždunarodnoj naučno-praktičeskoj konferencii, Moskva-Penza, 28-30 aprelja 2008 (pp. 86-96). Moskva: MNEPU.
E.T. Feteris (2008). The rational reconstruction of weighing and balancing on the basis of teleological-evaluative considerations in the justification of judicial decisions. Ratio Juris, 21 (4), 481-495.
E.T. Feteris (2008). Strategic maneuvering with the intention of the legislator in the justification of judicial decisions. Argumentation, 22 (3), 335-353.
E.T. Feteris (2008). The pragma-dialectical analysis and evaluation of teleological argumentation in a legal context. Argumentation, 22 (4), 489-506.[go to publisher's site]
E.T. Feteris (2008). Strategisch manoeuvreren met onaanvaardbare gevolgen en de bedoeling van de wetgever: manifestaties van strategisch manoeuvreren in de rechtvaardiging van juridische beslissingen. Tijdschrift voor Taalbeheersing, 30 (1), 58-74.
E.T. Feteris (2008). Weighing and balancing in the justification of judicial decisions. Informal logic, 28 (1), 20-30.[go to publisher's site]
E.T. Feteris (2008). Models for the analysis of legal argumentation: introduction. Informal logic, 28 (1), 1-5.[go to publisher's site]

2007

E.T. Feteris (2007). The rational reconstruction of teleological-evaluative arguments. In J. Aguilo - Regla (Ed.), Logic, argumentation and interpretation; proceedings of the IVR World Congress (22nd: 2005: Granada) (pp. 57-67). Stuttgart: Franz Steiner Verlag.
E.T. Feteris (2007). Comments on A.M. Vicunia. In H.V. Hansen, C.W. Tindale, J.A. Blair, R.H. Johnson & D.M. Godden (Eds.), Dissensus and the search for common ground: OSSA 2007. Windsor, ON: Ontario Society for the Study of Argumentation.
E.T. Feteris (2007). A normative reconstruction of arguments from reasonableness in the justification of judicial decisions. In F.H. van Eemeren, J.A Blair, C..A. Willard & B. Garssen (Eds.), Proceedings of the Sixth Conference of the International Society for the Study of Argumentation (pp. 393-398). Amsterdam: Sic Sat.
E.T. Feteris (2007). The pragma-dialectical reconstruction of teleological-evaluative argumentation in complex structures of legal justification. In H.V. Hansen, C.W. Tindale, J.A. Blair, R.H. Johnson & D.M. Godden (Eds.), Dissensus and the search for common ground: OSSA 2007. Windsor, ON: Ontario Society for the Study of Argumentation.

2006

E.T. Feteris (2006). The rational reconstruction of argumentation referring to consequences and purposes in the application of legal rules: a pragma-dialectical perspective. Argumentation, 19 (4), 459-470.
E.T. Feteris (2006). The rational reconstruction of complex forms of legal argumentation: Approaches from artificial inteligence and law and pragma-dialectics. Argumentation, 19 (4), 393-400.
E.T. Feteris (2006). Is de redelijkheid als argument een waardig familielid in een kritische discussie? In B. Garssen & A.F. Snoeck Henkemans (Eds.), De redelijkheid zelve. Tien pragma-dialectische opstellen voor Frans van Eemeren (pp. 23-36). Amsterdam: Rozenberg Publishers.
E.T. Feteris (2006). Pragmatic argumentation in law: A pragma-dialectical reconstruction of argumentation from unacceptable consequences in judicial decisions. In F. van Eemeren & P. Houtlosser (Eds.), Contemporary perspectives on argumentation. Views from the Venice Argumentation Conference (pp. 113-126). Amsterdam: Sic Sat.
E.T. Feteris (2006). Complexe argumentatie op basis van doelen en gevolgen bij de toepassing van rechtsregels. Tijdschrift voor Taalbeheersing, 28 (1), 15-25.
E.T. Feteris (2006). Arguments from unacceptable consequences in the justification of judicial opinions. In C. Dahlman & W. Krawietz (Eds.), Values, rights and duties in legal and philosophical discourse (Rechtstheorie, Beiheft, 21) (pp. 225-237).

2011

E. Feteris, B. Garssen & F. Snoeck Henkemans (2011). Introduction. In E. Feteris, B. Garssen & F. Snoeck Henkemans (Eds.), Keeping in touch with pragma-dialectics: in honor of Frans H. van Eemeren (pp. 1-4). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.

2009

E. Feteris (2009). Strategic manoeuvring with linguistic arguments in the justification of legal decisions. In Rhetoric in society: proceedings of the Second Conference Rhetoric in Society, Leiden University, Leiden, January 21-23 2009 [cd-rom]. Leiden: Leiden University.
E.T. Feteris (2009). Inleiding: [themanummer over taalkundige argumentatie]. Rechtsgeleerd Magazijn Themis, 2009 (2), 59-60.

2007

E.T. Feteris (2007). Teleological argumentation. In IVR encyclopedia of jirisprudence, legal theory and philosopy of law [digital encyclopedia].
E.T. Feteris (2007). La ricostruzione razionale dell'argomentazione teleologico-consequenzialista nella giustificazione delle decisioni giudiziali: una prospettiva pragam-dialettica. Ragion pratica, 27, 537-548.
E.T. Feteris (2007). Een rationele reconstructie van het wegen van belangen op basis van doelen. In J.A. Pontier (Ed.), bijdragen aan het Vijfde Symposium Juridische Argumentatie. Nijmegen: Ars Aequi.
J.A. Pontier, E.T. Feteris, H. Kloosterhuis & H.J. Plug (Eds.). (2007). 'Alles afwegende....' : bijdragen aan het Vijfde Symposium Juridische Argumentatie 22 juni 2007 te Rotterdam. Nijmegen: Ars Aequi Libri.

This page has been automatically generated by the UvA-Current Research Information System. If you have any questions about the content of this page, please contact the UBAcoach or the Metis staff of your faculty / institute. To edit your publications login to Personal Metis.

No ancillary activities

edit