dr. L. (Leendert) van Maanen
-
Faculty of Social and Behavioural Sciences
-
Nieuwe Achtergracht
129
1018 WS Amsterdam
Room number: DB2.15
-
l.vanmaanen@uva.nl
T: 0205256603
Multiple-choice decision making
How do people make multiple-choice perceptual decisions in a noisy environment? That is the core question of my postdoctoral research project. In the project we will test the ability of mathematical models of decision-making to capture the behavioral consequences involved when the number of response alternatives increases. In turn, these models will inform and constrain analysis of fMRI data.
2015
- L. van Maanen, B. Turner & B.U. Forstmann (2015). From model-based perceptual decision-making to spatial interference control. Current Opinion in Behavioral Sciences, 1, 72-77. doi: 10.1016/j.cobeha.2014.10.010
- B. Turner, L. van Maanen & B.U. Forstmann (in press). Combining cognitive abstractions with neurophysiology: The neural drift diffusion model. Psychological Review.
2014
- U. Boehm, L. van Maanen, B. Forstmann & H. van Rijn (2014). Trial-by-trial fluctuations in CNV amplitude reflect anticipatory adjustment of response caution. NeuroImage, 96, 95-105. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2014.03.063
- C. Donkin & L. van Maanen (2014). Piéron's Law is not just an artifact of the response mechanism. Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 62-63, 22-32. doi: 10.1016/j.jmp.2014.09.006
- L. van Maanen, R. de Jong & H. van Rijn (2014). How to assess the existence of competing strategies in cognitive tasks: a primer on the fixed-point property. PLoS One, 9 (8), e106113. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0106113[go to publisher's site]
- M.J. Mulder, L. van Maanen & B.U. Forstmann (2014). Perceptual decision neurosciences: a model-based review. Neuroscience, 277, 872-884. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroscience.2014.07.031
- J. Winkel, M.C. Keuken, L. van Maanen, E.J. Wagenmakers & B.U. Forstmann (2014). Early evidence affects later decisions: Why evidence accumulation is required to explain response time data. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 21 (3), 777-784. doi: 10.3758/s13423-013-0551-8
2013
- M.J. Mulder, M.C. Keuken, L. van Maanen, W.E. Boekel, B.U. Forstmann & E.J. Wagenmakers (2013). The speed and accuracy of perceptual decisions in a random-tone pitch task. Attention, Perception & Psychophysics, 75 (5), 1048-1058. doi: 10.3758/s13414-013-0447-8
- M.J. Mulder & L. van Maanen (2013). Are accuracy and reaction time affected via different processes? PLoS One, 8 (11), e80222. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0080222
2012
- L. van Maanen, R.P.P.P. Grasman, B.U. Forstmann, M.C. Keuken, S.D. Brown & E.-J. Wagenmakers (2012). Similarity and number of alternatives in the random-dot motion paradigm. Attention, Perception & Psychophysics, 74 (4), 739-753. doi: 10.3758/s13414-011-0267-7
- J. Winkel, L. van Maanen, R. Ratcliff, M.E. van der Schaaf, M.R. van Schouwenburg, R. Cools & B.U. Forstmann (2012). Bromocriptine does not alter speed-accuracy tradeoff. Frontiers in Decision Neuroscience, 6, 126. doi: 10.3389/fnins.2012.00126
- L. van Maanen, R.P.P.P. Grasman, B.U. Forstmann & E.-J. Wagenmakers (2012). Piéron’s Law and optimal behavior in perceptual decision-making. Frontiers in Decision Neuroscience, 5, 143. doi: 10.3389/fnins.2011.00143
- T. Ho, S. Brown, L. van Maanen, B.U. Forstmann, E.-J. Wagenmakers & J.T. Serences (2012). The optimality of sensory processing during the speed-accuracy tradeoff. Journal of Neuroscience, 32 (23), 7992-8003. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0340-12.2012
- L. van Maanen, H. van Rijn & N. Taatgen (2012). RACE/A: An architectural account of the interactions between learning, task control, and retrieval dynamics. Cognitive Science, 36 (1), 62-101. doi: 10.1111/j.1551-6709.2011.01213.x
2011
- L. van Maanen, R.P.P.P. Grasman, B.U. Forstmann & E.-J. Wagenmakers (2011). Piéron's law and optimal behavior in perceptual decision-making. Frontiers in Decision Neuroscience, 5:143. doi: 10.3389/fnins.2011.00143[go to publisher's site]
- L. van Maanen, S.D. Brown, T. Eichele, E.-J. Wagenmakers, T. Ho, J. Serences & B.U. Forstmann (2011). Neural correlates of trial-to-trial fluctuations in response caution. Journal of Neuroscience, 31 (48), 17488-17495. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2924-11.2011
This page has been automatically generated by the UvA-Current Research Information System. If you have any questions about the content of this page, please contact the UBAcoach or the Metis staff of your faculty / institute. To edit your publications login to Personal Metis.