Fotograaf: onbekend

dhr. prof. dr. F.H. (Frans) van Eemeren


  • Faculteit der Geesteswetenschappen
  • Bezoekadres
    P.C. Hoofthuis
    Spuistraat 134  Kamernummer: 506
  • Postadres:
    Spuistraat  134
    1012 VB  Amsterdam
  • F.H.vanEemeren@uva.nl
    T: 0205254711

Frans van Eemeren

Frans van Eemeren is Emeritus Professor in the Department of Speech Communication, Argumentation Theory and Rhetoric at the University of Amsterdam. He is Guest Professor at Leiden University.

His research interests include argumentation theory and rhetorical and dialectical analysis of argumentative discourse.

Together with Rob Grootendorst (1944-2000), Frans van Eemeren is the auctor intellectualis of the influential pragma-dialectical approach to argumentation. The pragma-dialectical theory systematically combines normative insights from philosophical dialectics and dialogue logic with pragmatic insights fromspeech acttheory, Gricean theory, and discourse analysis and is applied in the analysis, evaluation and production of oral and written argumentative discourse. The theory incorporates the notion of an ideal model for critical discussion, with 10 procedural rules governing the process of resolving a difference of opinion on the merits. Each violation of a discussion rule means that a fallacy has been committed which hinders the possibility of the difference of opinion being resolved in a reasonable manner.

In the last decade, Frans van Eemeren has worked together with Peter Houtlosser (1956-2008) on the development of a fruitful theoretical approach to the "argumentative predicament" in argumentative discourse of pursuing both the aims of remaining reasonable and resolving a difference of opinion in one's own favour at the same time. This research project centers around   the notion of strategic maneuvering, pertaining to thewayin which a discussant maneuvers between dialectical and rhetorical requirements.

In 2010 he published the monograph Strategic Maneuvering in Argumentative Discourse, which proposes an integration of rhetorical insights in the pragma-dialectical method for reconstructing and evaluating argumentative discourse.

Van Eemeren is (co-)author of some fifty book publications along with a large number of articles and book chapters. Among his key publications are Speech Acts in Argumentative Discussions (1984), Argumentation,Communication, and Fallacies (1992), Reconstructing Argumentative Discourse (1993), Fundamentals of Argumentation Theory (1996), A Systematic Theory of Argumentation (2004), and Argumentative Indicators in Discourse (2007), and Fallacies and Judgments of Reasonableness (2009). Publications of Frans van Eemeren have been translated into Albanian, Armenian, Bulgarian, Chinese, Dutch, French, Italian, Russian and Spanish.

The RMA program 'Rhetoric, Argumentation theory and Philosophy' at the University of Amsterdam has been developed by Frans van Eemeren together with other members of the department of Speech Communication, Argumentation Theory and Rhetoric to provide a solid background in argumentation theory and its foundations for both national and international students interested in doing research. S tudents from both the Netherlands and other countries all over the world are instructed on various subjects such as argumentation theory, speech act theory, the philosophy of language, fallacies, empirical research methods and logic. The program is held in very high esteem both nationally and internationally and has led to successful PhD applications for almost all of its graduates.

Frans vanEemeren is a Distinguished Scholar of the National CommunicationAssociation of the United States, Fulbright Professor, recipient of various research awards, chairman of the International Society for the Study of Argumentation (ISSA), and Editor-in-Chief of the journal Argumentation , Springer's Argumentation Library, and John Benjamins' book series Argumentation in Context.

A complete publication list of Frans van Eemeren is available upon request.

Journals

Presentation of the 2011 ISSA Award by Francisca Snoeck Henkemans, on 4 July 2014, at the Zuiderkerk in Amsterdam

Knighthood in the Order of the Dutch Lion

Knighthood in the Order of the Dutch Lion

Awarded 28 June, 2013 at the Amsterdam City Hall by the Mayor of Amsterdam, Mr. Eberhart van der Laan, on behalf of King Willem Alexander of the Netherlands

Valediction Speech

Frans van Eemeren presented his valediction speech 'In reasonableness' on the occasion of his retirement as Chair of the Department of Speech Communication, Argumentation Theory and Rhetoric of the University of Amsterdam in the Lutheran Church on May 13, 2011.

Audience at valediction speech

Farewell Colloquium with festschrift

Contributors to 'Considering Pragma-Dialectics' (Festschrift edited by Eveline Feteris, Bart Garssen, and Francisca Snoeck Henkemans) offered to van Eemeren by his colleagues at the Frans van Eemeren Argumentation Conference at Doelenzaal,University of Amsterdam, May 12, 2011.

From left to right:

Sara Rubinelli, Bart Garssen, Jean Wagemans, Constanza Ihnen Jory, Yvon Tonnard, Bilal Amjarso, Francisca Snoeck Henkemans, Jan Albert van Laar, Roosmaryn Pilgram, Lotte van Poppel, Jose Plug, Frans van Eemeren, Eveline Feteris, David Zarefsky, Dima Mohammed, Bert Meuffels, Peter Schulz, Agnes van Rees, Marcin Lewinski, Corina Andone, Daniel O'Keefe, Anca Gata, Ton van Haaften, Erik Krabbe

Honorary Degree Universita della Svizzera italiana

17 April 2010

Strategic Maneuvering in Argumentative Discourse. Extending the Pragma-Dialectical Theory of Argumentation

In Strategic Maneuvering in Argumentative Discourse , Frans H. van Eemeren brings together the dialectical and the rhetorical dimensions of argumentation by introducing the concept of strategic maneuvering. Strategic maneuveringrefers to the arguer's continual eff orts to reconcile aiming for eff ectiveness with being reasonable. It takes place in all stages of argumentative discourse and manifests itself simultaneously in the choices that are made from the topical potential available at a particular stage, in adaptation to audience demand, and in the use of specifi c presentational devices. Strategic maneuvering derails when in the specifi c context in which the discourse takes place a rule for critical discussion has been violated, so that a fallacy has been committed. Van Eemeren makes clear that extending the pragma-dialectical approach to argumentation by taking account of strategic maneuveringleads toaricher and more precise method for analyzing and evaluating argumentative discourse.

Translated into Spanish; Chinese and Italian translation in preparation.

Fallacies and Judgments of Reasonableness, 2009

In Fallacies and Judgments of Reasonableness , Frans H. van Eemeren, Bart Garssen and Bert Meuffels report on their systematic empirical research of the conventional validity of the pragma-dialectical discussion rules. The experimental studies they carried out duringmore than ten years start from the pragma-dialectical theory of argumentation developed at the University of Amsterdam, their home university. In these studies they test methodically the intersubjective acceptability of the rules for critical discussion proposed in this theory by confronting ordinary arguers who have not received any special education in argumentation and fallacies with discussion fragments containing both fallacious and non-fallacious argumentative moves. The research covers a wide range of informal fallacies. In this way, the authors create a basis for comparing the theoretical reasonableness conception of pragma-dialectics with the norms for judging argumentative moves prevailing in argumentative practice. Fallacies and Judgments of Reasonableness provides a unique insight into the relationship between theoretical and practical conceptions of reasonableness, supported by extensive empirical material gained by means of sophisticatedexperimental research.

Argumentative Indicators in Discourse

 

Frans H. van Eemeren, Peter Houtlosser & A. Francisca Snoeck Henkemans (2007)

Argumentative Indicators: A Pragma-Dialectical Study identifies and analyses English words and expressions that are crucial for an adequate reconstruction of argumentative discourse. It provides the analyst of argumentative discussions and texts with a systematic set of instruments for giving a well-founded analysis which results in an analytic overview of the elements that are relevant for the evaluation of the argumentation. In the book a systematic connection is made between linguistic insights into the characteristics of argumentative discourse and insights from argumentation theory into the resolution of differences of opinion by means of argumentation.

A systematic theory of argumentation provides an overview of the standard theory of pragma-dialectics as it was developed by Frans van Eemeren and Rob Grootendorst. The monograph is translated into Bulgarian, Chinese, Italian, Russian and Spanish.

Distinguished Scholar Award National Communication Association

Two Festschrifts for Frans van Eemeren

De redelijkheid zelve. Tien pragma-dialectische opstellenvoor Frans van Eemeren

Bart Garssen and Francisca Snoeck Henkemans (ed.), Rozenberg Publishers, Amsterdam

In De redelijkheid zelve [reasonableness personified] ten essays are published that were written in honour of Frans van Eemeren, on the occasionof his sixtieth birthday. The authors are all actively engaged in research aimed at developing the pragma-dialectical theory of argumentation. The ten rules for critical discussion that are a vital part of this theory are the source of inspiration as well as the rationale of this collection. Most authors are former PhD students supervised by van Eemeren. They are now his colleagues either in the department of Speech Communication, Argumentation Theory at the University of Amsterdamor in other universities in The Netherlands.

Considering Pragma-Dialectics. A Festschrift for Frans H. van Eemeren on the Occasion of his 60 th Birthday

Peter Houtlosser and Agnès van Rees (ed.), Lawrence Erlbaum, Mahwah, New Jersey

Besides the Festchrift devoted to the norms for reasonable argumentation written by his Dutch colleagues, his international colleagues presented Frans van Eemeren with another Festschrift at the Sixth Conference of the International Society for the Study of Argumentation (ISSA), which was held in Amsterdam from June 27 to June 30, 2006, in Amsterdam. Considering Pragma-Dialectics contains essays discussing the pragma-dialectical theory of argumentationthat were written by fellow argumentation theorists from ten different countries.The content of the 26 essays varies from philosophical and theoretical reflection on the pragma-dialectical theory of argumentation to empirical tests and applications of certain parts of this theory. The book is a Festschrift, but it is at the same time a must for all thosewhoare interested in the international reception of the pragma-dialectical theory.

2016

  • van Eemeren, F. H., & Andone, C. (2016). Argumentation and communicative practices. In A. Rocci, & L. de Saussure (Eds.), Verbal Communication. (pp. 245-268). (Handbook of Communication Science; No. 3). Berlin/Boston: Walter de Gruyter. DOI: 10.1515/9783110255478-014  [details] 

2015

  • van Eemeren, F. H., Garssen, B., & Meuffels, B. (2015). Efectividad razonable: Pasos preliminares para una investigación pragma-dialéctica de la efectividad. In F. Leal Carretero (Ed.), Argumentación y pragma-dialéctica: Estudios en honor a Frans van Eemeren (pp. 181-207). Guadalajara: Guadalajara: Editorial Universitaria Universidad de Guadalajara. [details] 
  • van Eemeren, F. H., Garssen, B., & Meuffels, B. (2015). The disguised ad baculum fallacy empirically investigated: Strategic maneuvering with threats. In F. H. van Eemeren, & B. Garssen (Eds.), Scrutinizing argumentation in practice (pp. 313-326). (Argumentation in context; No. 9). Amsterdam: Benjamins. DOI: 10.1075/aic.9.18eem  [details] 
  • van Eemeren, F. H., & Garssen, B. (2015). Analysis and evaluation of argumentative discourse. In F. H. van Eemeren (Ed.), Reasonableness and Effectiveness in Argumentative Discourse: Fifty Contributions to the Development of Pragma-Dialectics. (pp. 507-519). (Argumentation Library; No. 27). Cham: Springer. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-20955-5_26  [details] 
  • van Eemeren, F. H., & Garssen, B. (2015). Exploiting the room for strategic maneuvering in argumentative discourse: Dealing with audience demand in the European Parliament. In F. H. van Eemeren (Ed.), Reasonableness and Effectiveness in Argumentative Discourse: Fifty Contributions to the Development of Pragma-Dialectics. (pp. 859-872). (Argumentation Library; No. 27). Cham: Springer. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-20955-5_47  [details] 
  • van Eemeren, F. H., & Garssen, B. (2015). In Varietate Concordia-United in diversity: European Parliamentary debate as an argumentative activity type. In F. H. van Eemeren (Ed.), Reasonableness and Effectiveness in Argumentative Discourse: Fifty Contributions to the Development of Pragma-Dialectics. (pp. 843-858). (Argumentation Library; No. 27). Cham: Springer. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-20955-5_46  [details] 
  • van Eemeren, F. H., & Garssen, B. (2015). Linguistic criteria for judging composition and division fallacies. In F. H. van Eemeren (Ed.), Reasonableness and Effectiveness in Argumentative Discourse: Fifty Contributions to the Development of Pragma-Dialectics. (pp. 595-609). (Argumentation Library; No. 27). Cham: Springer. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-20955-5_31  [details] 
  • van Eemeren, F. H., & Garssen, B. (2015). Reconstructing argumentative discourse with the help of speech act conditions. In F. H. van Eemeren (Ed.), Reasonableness and Effectiveness in Argumentative Discourse: Fifty Contributions to the Development of Pragma-Dialectics. (pp. 469-486). (Argumentation Library; No. 27). Cham: Springer. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-20955-5_24  [details] 
  • van Eemeren, F. H., Garssen, B., & Meuffels, B. (2015). De vermomde ad baculum drogreden empirisch onderzocht. Tijdschrift voor Taalbeheersing, 37(1), 79-96. DOI: 10.1557/TVT2015.1.EEME  [details] 
  • van Eemeren, F. H., Garssen, B., & Meuffels, B. (2015). Effectiveness through reasonableness: A pragma-dialectical perspective. In F. H. van Eemeren (Ed.), Reasonableness and Effectiveness in Argumentative Discourse: Fifty Contributions to the Development of Pragma-Dialectics. (pp. 771-791). (Argumentation Library; No. 27). Cham: Springer. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-20955-5_42  [details] 
  • van Eemeren, F. H., Garssen, B., & Meuffels, B. (2015). The Disguised Ad Baculum Fallacy Empirically Investigated: Strategic Maneuvering With Threats. In B. Garssen, D. Godden, G. Mitchell, & F. Snoeck Henkemans (Eds.), International Society for the Study of Argumentation: 8th International Conference on Argumentation: July 1-July 4, 2014, University of Amsterdam, The Netherlands (pp. 1396-1407). Amsterdam: Sic Sat. [details] 
  • van Eemeren, F. H., Garssen, B., & Meuffels, B. (2015). The disguised abusive ad hominem empirically investigated: Strategic maneuvering with direct personal attacks. In F. H. van Eemeren (Ed.), Reasonableness and Effectiveness in Argumentative Discourse: Fifty Contributions to the Development of Pragma-Dialectics. (pp. 793-811). (Argumentation Library; No. 27). Cham: Springer. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-20955-5_43  [details] 
  • van Eemeren, F. H., Garssen, B., & Meuffels, B. (2015). The disguised ad baculum fallacy empirically investigated: Strategic maneuvering with threats. In F. H. van Eemeren (Ed.), Reasonableness and Effectiveness in Argumentative Discourse: Fifty Contributions to the Development of Pragma-Dialectics. (pp. 813-824). (Argumentation Library; No. 27). Cham: Springer. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-20955-5_44  [details] 
  • van Eemeren, F. H., Grootendorst, R., & Meuffels, B. (2015). The skill of identifying argumentation. In F. H. van Eemeren (Ed.), Reasonableness and Effectiveness in Argumentative Discourse: Fifty Contributions to the Development of Pragma-Dialectics. (pp. 733-741). (Argumentation Library; No. 27). Cham: Springer. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-20955-5_39  [details] 
  • van Eemeren, F. H., Houtlosser, P., & Snoeck Henkemans, A. F. (2015). Dialectical profiles and indicators of argumentative moves. In F. H. van Eemeren (Ed.), Reasonableness and Effectiveness in Argumentative Discourse: Fifty Contributions to the Development of Pragma-Dialectics. (pp. 681-702). (Argumentation Library; No. 27). Cham: Springer. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-20955-5_36  [details] 
  • van Eemeren, F., Garssen, B., & Meuffels, B. (2015). Efectividad razonabele: pasos preliminares para una investicación pragma-dialéctica de la efectividad. In F. Leal Carretero (Ed.), Argumentación y pragma-dialéctica: estudios en honor a Frans van Eemeren. (pp. 178-203). Guadalajara: Universidad de Guadalajara.
  • van Eemeren, F., Garssen, B., & Meuffels, B. (2015). Investigación empírica del ad hominem abusivo: Maniobrar estratégico con ataques personales directos. In F. Leal Carretero (Ed.), Argumentación y pragma-dialéctica: estudios en honor a Frans van Eemeren (pp. 257-279). Guadalajara: Editiorial Universitaria Universidad de Guadalajara. [details] 
  • van Eemeren, F., Garssen, B., & Meuffels, B. (2015). The extended pragma-dialectical argumentation theory empirically interpretated. In F. H. van Eemeren (Ed.), Reasonableness and Effectiveness in Argumentative Discourse: Fifty Contributions to the Development of Pragma-Dialectics. (pp. 757-769). (Argumentation Library; No. 27). Cham: Springer. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-20955-5_41  [details] 
  • van Eemeren, F., Garssen, B., & Wagemans, J. (2015). El método pragma-dialéctico de análisis y evaluación. In F. Leal Carretero (Ed.), Argumentación y pragma-dialéctica: estudios en honor a Frans van Eemeren. (pp. 127-154). Guadalajara: Universidad de Guadalajara.

2014

  • van Eemeren, F. H., & Garssen, B. (2014). Analogie-argumentatie in stereotiepe argumentative patronen. Tijdschrift voor Taalbeheersing, 36(1), 31-50. DOI: 10.5117/TVT2014.1.EEME  [details] 
  • van Eemeren, F. H., & Garssen, B. (2014). Argumentation by analogy in stereotypical argumentative patterns. In H. Jales Ribeiro (Ed.), Systematic approaches to argument by analogy (pp. 41-56). (Argumentation library; No. 25). Cham: Springer. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-06334-8_3  [details] 
  • van Eemeren, F. H., Garssen, B., Krabbe, E. C. W., Snoeck Henkemans, A. F., Verheij, B., & Wagemans, J. H. M. (2014). Handbook of argumentation theory. Dordrecht: Springer. DOI: 10.1007/978-90-481-9473-5  [details] 

2013

  • van Eemeren, F. H., & Garssen, B. (2013). Argumentative patterns in discourse. In D. Mohammed, & M. Lewiński (Eds.), Virtues of argumentation: proceedings of the 10th International Conference of the Ontario Society for the Study of Argumentation (OSSA), 22-26 May 2013 Windsor, ON: OSSA. [details] 

2012

  • van Eemeren, F. H., & Garssen, B. (2012). Exploiting the room for strategic maneuvering in argumentative discourse: dealing with audience demand in the European Parliament. In F. H. van Eemeren, & B. Garssen (Eds.), Exploring argumentative contexts (pp. 43-58). (Argumentation in context; No. 4). Amsterdam: Benjamins. DOI: 10.1075/aic.4.03van  [details] 
  • van Eemeren, F. H., Garssen, B., & Meuffels, B. (2012). De vermomde 'abusive ad hominem'-drogreden empirisch onderzocht: strategisch manoeuvreren met directe persoonlijke aanvallen. Tijdschrift voor Taalbeheersing, 34(2), 135-155. DOI: 10.5117/TVT2012.2.DE_V423  [details] 
  • van Eemeren, F. H., Garssen, B., & Meuffels, B. (2012). Effectiveness through reasonableness: a pragma-dialectical perspective: preliminary steps to pragma-dialectical effectiveness research. Argumentation, 26(1), 33-53. DOI: 10.1007/s10503-011-9234-7  [details] 
  • van Eemeren, F. H., Garssen, B., & Meuffels, B. (2012). The disguised 'abusive ad hominem' empirically investigated: strategic manoeuvring with direct personal attacks. Thinking and Reasoning, 18(3), 344-364. DOI: 10.1080/13546783.2012.678666  [details] 
  • van Eemeren, F. H., Garssen, B., & Meuffels, B. (2012). The extended pragma-dialectical argumentation theory empirically interpreted. In F. H. Eemeren, & B. Garssen (Eds.), Topical themes in argumentation theory: twenty exploratory studies (pp. 323-343). (Argumentation library; No. 22). Dordrecht: Springer. DOI: 10.1007/978-94-007-4041-9_21  [details] 

2011

  • van Eemeren, F. H., Garssen, B., & Wagemans, J. H. M. (2011). The pragma-dialectical method of analysis. In R. C. Rowland (Ed.), Reasoned argument and social change: selected papers from the 17th Biennial Conference on Argumentation (pp. 25-47). Washington, DC: National Communication Association. [details] 
  • van Eemeren, F., Garssen, B., & Meuffels, B. (2011). The extended pragma-dialectical argumentation theory empirically interpreted. In F. H. van Eemeren, B. Garssen, D. Godden, & G. Mitchell (Eds.), Proceedings of the 7th Conference of the International Society for the Study of Argumentation (pp. 411-422). Amsterdam: Rozenberg/Sic Sat. [details] 

2010

  • Snoeck Henkemans, F., van Eemeren, F. H., & Houtlosser, P. (2010). Profils dialectiques et indicateurs de 'coups' argumentatifs. Verbum, 32(1), 53-71. [details] 
  • van Eemeren, F. H. (2010). Strategic maneuvering in political discourse: a pragma-dialectical approach [introduction]. Controversia, 7(1), 11-15. [details] 
  • van Eemeren, F. H., & Garssen, B. (2010). 'In varietate concordia' - United in diversity: European parliamentary debate as an argumentative activity type. Controversia, 7(1), 19-37. [details] 
  • van Eemeren, F. H., & Garssen, B. (2010). Constraints on political deliberation: European parliamentary debate as an argumentative activity type. In D. S. Gouran (Ed.), The functions of argument and social context: selected papers from the 16th Biennial Conference on Argumentation (pp. 505-514). Washington, DC: National Communication Association. [details] 
  • van Eemeren, F. H., & Garssen, B. (2010). Linguistic criteria for judging composition and division fallacies. In A. Capone (Ed.), Perspectives on language use and pragmatics: a volume in memory of Sorin Stati (pp. 35-50). (LINCOM studies in pragmatics; No. 16). München: Lincom Europa. [details] 
  • van Eemeren, F., Garssen, B., & Meuffels, B. (2010). De uitgebreide pragma-dialectische argumentatietheorie empirisch geïnterpreteerd. Tijdschrift voor Taalbeheersing, 32(1), 49-62. DOI: 10.5117/TVT2010.1.DE_U370  [details] 

2009

  • van Eemeren, F. H. (2009). Strategic manoeuvring between rhetorical effectiveness and dialectical reasonableness. In H. Jales Ribeiro (Ed.), Rhetoric and argumentation in the beginning of the XXIst century (pp. 55-72). Coimbra: Imprensa da Universidade de Coimbra. [details] 
  • van Eemeren, F. H., Greco Morasso, S., Grossen, M., Perret-Clermont, A-N., & Rigotti, E. (2009). Argupolis: a doctoral program on argumentation practices in different contexts. Studies in Communication Sciences, 9(1), 289-301. [details] 
  • van Eemeren, F. H., & Garssen, B. (2009). Analysis and evaluation of argumentative discourse. In J. Renkema (Ed.), Discourse, of course: an overview of research in discourse studies (pp. 171-184). Amsterdam: Benjamins. [details] 
  • van Eemeren, F. H., & Garssen, B. (2009). Putting pragma-dialectics into practice. In J. Sobocan, & L. Groarke (Eds.), Critical thinking education and assessment: can higher order thinking be tested? (pp. 247-262). London, ONT: Althouse. [details] 
  • van Eemeren, F. H., & Garssen, B. (2009). The fallacies of composition and division revisited. Cogency, 1(1), 23-42. [details] 
  • van Eemeren, F., Garssen, B., & Meuffels, B. (2009). Fallacies and judgments of reasonableness: empirical research concerning the pragma-dialectical discussion rules. (Argumentation library; No. 16). Dordrecht: Springer. [details] 

2008

  • van Eemeren, F. H. (2008). Rhetoric, argument and persuasion. In W. Donsbach (Ed.), The international encyclopedia of communication. - Vol. 9: Precision journalism, rhetoric in Western Europe: Britain (pp. 4215-4219). Malden, MA [etc.]: Blackwell. DOI: 10.1111/b.9781405131995.2008.x  [details] 
  • van Eemeren, F. H. (2008). Special issue on Strategic Maneuvering in Institutional Contexts dedicated to Peter Houtlosser (1956-2008). Argumentation, 22(3), 305-315. DOI: 10.1007/s10503-008-9084-0  [details] 
  • van Eemeren, F. H. (2008). The language of argumentation in Dutch. Argumentation and Advocacy, 44(3), 155-158. [details] 
  • van Eemeren, F. H. (2008). The need for well-considered normativity in the study of argumentation. In T. Suzuki, T. Kato, & A. Kubuta (Eds.), Proceedings of the 3rd Tokyo Conference on Argumentation: argumentation, the law and justice (pp. 57-65). Tokyo: Japan Debate Association. [details] 
  • van Eemeren, F. H. (2008). The study of argumentation. In A. A. Lunsford, K. H. Wilson, & R. A. Eberly (Eds.), The Sage handbook of rhetorical studies (pp. 109-124). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. [details] 
  • van Eemeren, F. H. (2008). Valuing validity as reasonableness: rationale for a pragma-dialectical perspective. In P. Nerhot (Ed.), Truth and judgement (pp. 199-222). (Filosofia; No. 195). Milano: Franco Angeli. [details] 
  • van Eemeren, F. H., Williams, D. C., & Zagar, I. Z. (2008). Preface. In F. H. van Eemeren, D. C. Williams, & I. Z. Zagar (Eds.), Understanding argumentation: work in progress (pp. 9). Amsterdam: Sic Sat-Rozenberg. [details] 
  • van Eemeren, F. H., & Garssen, B. (2008). Controversy and confrontation in argumentative discourse. In F. H. van Eemeren, & B. Garssen (Eds.), Controversy and confrontation: relating controversy analysis with argumentation theory (pp. 1-26). (Controversies; No. 6). Amsterdam: Benjamins. [details] 
  • van Eemeren, F. H., & Garssen, B. (2008). Preface. In F. H. van Eemeren, & B. Garssen (Eds.), Controversy and confrontation: relating controversy analysis with argumentation theory (pp. vii-viii). (Controversies; No. 6). Amsterdam: Benjamins. [details] 
  • van Eemeren, F. H., & Grootendorst, R. (2008). Una teoria sistematica dell'argomentazione: l'approccio pragma-dialettico. (Il quadrato delle opposizioni). Milano: Mimesis. [details] 
  • van Eemeren, F. H., & Houtlosser, P. (2008). Kinship: the relationship between Johnstone's ideas about philosophical argument and the pragma-dialectical theory of argumentation. In G. Hauser (Ed.), Philosophy and rhetoric in dialogue: redrawing their intellectual landscape (pp. 51-70). University park, PA: Pennsylvania State University Press. [details] 
  • van Eemeren, F. H., & Houtlosser, P. (2008). Rhetoric in a dialectical framework: fallacies as derailments of strategic manoeuvring. In E. Weigand (Ed.), Dialogue and rhetoric (pp. 133-151). (Dialogue studies; No. 2). Amsterdam/NewYork: Benjamins. [details] 
  • van Eemeren, F. H., & Houtlosser, P. (2008). Strategic manoeuvring in argumentative discourse: exploring the boundaries of reasonableness. In F. H. van Eemeren, D. C. Williams, & I. Z. Zagar (Eds.), Understanding argumentation: work in progress (pp. 13-25). Amsterdam: Sic Sat-Rozenberg. [details] 
  • van Eemeren, F. H., & Houtlosser, P. (2008). Within the bounds of reason: strategic maneuvering in argumentative discourse. In K. Korta, & J. Garmendia (Eds.), Meaning, intentions, and argumentation (pp. 209-235). (CSLI lecture notes; No. 186). Stanford: CSLI Publications. [details] 
  • van Eemeren, F. H., Houtlosser, P., & Snoeck Henkemans, A. F. (2008). Dialectical profiles and indicators of argumentative moves. Journal of Pragmatics, 40(3), 475-493. DOI: 10.1016/j.pragma.2007.12.002  [details] 
  • van Eemeren, F., Garssen, B., & Meuffels, B. (2008). Reasonableness in confrontation: empirical evidence concerning the assessment of ad hominem fallacies. In F. H. van Eemeren, & B. Garssen (Eds.), Controversy and confrontation: relating controversy analysis with argumentation theory (pp. 181-195). (Controversies; No. 6). Amsterdam etc.: John Benjamins. [details] 

2007

  • van Eemeren, F. H. (2007). Goodwin gets her gun. Comments on Jean Goodwin's "What, in practice, is an argument?". In A. Anthony Blais, H. Hansen, R. Johnson, & C. Tindale (Eds.), Ontario Society for the Study of Argumentation Proceedings 2007 [CD-ROM]. Windsor: University of Windsor. [details] 
  • van Eemeren, F. H. (2007). Reasonableness in situated discourse: fallacies as derailments of strategic manoeuvring. University of Bucharest Review, 9(2), 5-20. [details] 
  • van Eemeren, F. H., & Houtlosser, P. (2007). A procedural view of critical reasonableness. In T. Dubrovskaya, M. Kuczyński, & O. Abrahamova (Eds.), Modern Developments in Linguistics and Language Teaching: international conference proceedings (pp. 77-85). Moscow: International Independent University of Ecology and Political Science. [details] 
  • van Eemeren, F. H., & Houtlosser, P. (2007). Coming to grips with argumentative discourse. In H. V. Hansen, & R. Pinto (Eds.), Reason Reclaimed. Festschrift for J. Anthony Blair and Ralph Johnson. (pp. 44-59). (Studies in Critical Thinking and Informal Logic; No. 5). Newport: Vale Press. [details] 
  • van Eemeren, F. H., & Houtlosser, P. (2007). Countering fallacious moves. Argumentation, 21(3), 243-252. [details] 
  • van Eemeren, F. H., & Houtlosser, P. (2007). Kinship: The relationship between Johnstone's ideas about philosophical argument and the pragma-dialectical theory of argumentation. Philosophy and Rhetoric, 40(1), 51-70. DOI: 10.1353/par.2007.0017  [details] 
  • van Eemeren, F. H., & Houtlosser, P. (2007). Reconnecting dialectic and rhetoric: fallacies as derailments of strategic manoeuvring in argumentative discourse. Anthropology & Philosophy, 8(1-2), 49-67. [details] 
  • van Eemeren, F. H., & Houtlosser, P. (2007). Seizing the occasion. Parameters for analysing ways of strategic manoeuvring. In F. H. van Eemeren, J. H. Blair, C. A. Willard, & B. J. Garssen (Eds.), Proceedings of the 6th Conference of the International Society for the Study of Argumentation. (pp. 375-380). Amsterdam: Sic Sat. [details] 
  • van Eemeren, F. H., & Houtlosser, P. (2007). Strategic manoeuvring in argumentative discourse: Exploring the boundaries of reasonableness. In T. Dubrovskaya, M. Kuczynski, & O. Abramova (Eds.), Modern Developments in Linguistics and Language Teaching: International Conference Proceedings I/II. (pp. 5-22). Moscow: International Independent University of Ecology and Political Science. [details] 
  • van Eemeren, F. H., & Houtlosser, P. (2007). Strategic manoeuvring in argumentative discourse: Maintaining a delicate balance. Discourse Studies, 5, 238-267. [details] 
  • van Eemeren, F. H., & Houtlosser, P. (2007). Strategic manoeuvring: A synthetic recapitulation. Argumentation, 20, 381-392. [details] 
  • van Eemeren, F. H., & Houtlosser, P. (2007). The contextuality of fallacies. Informal logic, 27(1), 59-67. [details] 
  • van Eemeren, F. H., & Houtlosser, P. (2007). The study of argumentation as normative pragmatics. Pragmatics & Cognition, 15(1), 161-177. [details] 
  • van Eemeren, F. H., Garssen, B. J., & Meuffels, B. (2007). Convergent operations in empirical ad hominem research. In F. H. van Eemeren, J. A. Blair, C. A. Willard, & B. Garssen (Eds.), Proceedings of the Sixth Conference of the International Society for the Study of Argumentation. (pp. 367-373). Amsterdam: Sic Sat. [details] 
  • van Eemeren, F. H., Garssen, B., & Meuffels, B. (2007). De conventionele deugdelijkheid van de pragma-dialectische discussieregels. Tijdschrift voor Taalbeheersing, 29(3), 251-274. [details] 
  • van Eemeren, F. H., Houtlosser, P., & Snoeck Henkemans, A. F. (2007). Argumentative indicators in discourse: a pragma-dialectical study. (Argumentation library; No. 12). Dordrecht: Springer. DOI: 10.1007/978-1-4020-6244-5  [details] 
  • van Eemeren, F. H., Houtlosser, P., & Snoeck Henkemans, A. F. (2007). Dialectical profiles and indicators of argumentative moves. In H. V. Hansen, C. W. Tindale, J. A. Blair, R. H. Johnson, & D. M. Godden (Eds.), Dissensus and the search for common ground: OSSA 2007. Windsor, ON: Ontario Society for the Study of Argumentation. [details] 

2006

  • Garssen, B. J., van Eemeren, F. H., & Meuffels, B. (2006). This can't be true, that would be terrible: Ordinary arguers judgments about ad consequentiam fallacies. In C. A. Willard (Ed.), Critical Problems in Argumentation. Selected Papers. (pp. 669-675). Washington DC: National Communication Association. [details] 
  • van Eemeren, F. H., & Houtlosser, P. (2006). Complementary dialectical and rhetorical considerations. An analysis of a burden of proof manipulation. In F. H. Eemeren, & P. Houtlosser (Eds.), Contemporary Perspectives on Argumentation: Views from the Venice Argumentation Conference.. (pp. 37-46). Amsterdam: Sic Sat. [details] 
  • van Eemeren, F. H., & Houtlosser, P. (2006). Countering fallacious moves. In P. Riley (Ed.), Engaging Argument. Selected Papers from the 2005 NCA/AFA Summer Conference on Argumentation sponsored by the National Communication Association, the American Forensic Association and the University of Utah.. (pp. 432-437). Alta: National Communication Association. [details] 
  • van Eemeren, F. H., & Houtlosser, P. (2006). Strategisch manoeuvreren, het model van een kritische discussie en conventionele actietypen. Tijdschrift voor Taalbeheersing, 28(1), 1-14. [details] 
  • van Eemeren, F. H., & Houtlosser, P. (2006). The case of pragma-dialectics. In S. Parsons, & N. Maudet (Eds.), Argumentation in Multi-Agent Systems. Second International Workshop, ArgMAS 2005, Revised Selected and Invited Papers.. (pp. 1-28). Berlin: Springer. [details] 
  • van Eemeren, F. H., Garssen, B., & Meuffels, B. (2006). Apples and oranges, peer pressure, and other such troublemakers: ordinary arguers' opinions about violations of the pragma-dialectical argument scheme rule. In P. Riley, & C. Willis-Chun (Eds.), Engaging argument: selected papers from the 2005 NCA/AFA Summer Conference on Argumentation: sponsored by the National Communication Association, the American Forensics Association, and the University of Utah. (pp. 445-452). Washington, DC: National Communication Association. [details] 
  • van Eemeren, F. H., Garssen, B., & Meuffels, B. (2006). La validez convencional de la regla pragma-dialectica de libertad. Praxis, 9, 17-32.

2016

  • van Eemeren, F., & Snoeck Henkemans, F. (2016). Argumentatie: inleiding in het identificeren van meningsverschillen en het analyseren, beoordelen en houden van betogen. - 5e herziene druk. Groningen: Noordhoff Uitgevers. [details] 

2013

  • van Eemeren, F. H., & Garssen, B. (2013). Viewing the study of argumentation as normative pragmatics. In A. Capone, F. Lo Piparo, & M. Carapezza (Eds.), Perspectives on pragmatics and philosophy (pp. 515-536). (Perspectives in Pragmatics, Philosophy & Psychology; No. 1). Cham: Springer. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-01011-3_24  [details] 
  • van Eemeren, F. H., Garssen, B., & Meuffels, B. (2013). De vermomde abusive ad hominem empirisch onderzocht: strategisch manoeuvreren met directe persoonlijke aanvallen. In R. Boogaart, & H. Jansen (Eds.), Studies in taalbeheersing 4 (pp. 81-90). Assen: Koninklijke Van Gorcum. [details] 

2012

  • van Eemeren, F. H., & Garssen, B. (2012). Dialogue rules for argumentation. In S. Cantarini (Ed.), Dialogue: state of the art: studies in memory of Sorin Stati (pp. 272-286). (LINCOM studies in pragmatics; No. 22). München: Lincom Europa. [details] 
  • van Eemeren, F. H., & Garssen, B. (2012). Strategic maneuvering in political argumentation: the plenary debate in the European Parliament as an argumentative activity type. In M. Constantinescu, G. Stoica, & O. Uţă Bărbulescu (Eds.), Modernitate și interdisciplinaritate în cercetarea lingvistică: omagiu doamnei profesor Liliana Ionescu-Ruxăndoiu (pp. 227-241). București: Editura Universităţii din București. [details] 

2011

  • van Eemeren, F., & Snoeck Henkemans, F. (2011). Argumentatie: inleiding in het identificeren van meningsverschillen en het analyseren, beoordelen en houden van betogen. - 4e herz. dr. Groningen: Noordhoff. [details] 

2009

  • van Eemeren, F. H., & Garssen, B. (2009). 'In varietate concordia' - United in diversity: European parliamentary debate as an argumentative activity type. In J. Ritola (Ed.), Argument cultures: proceedings of OSSA '09 Windsor, ON: Ontario Society for the Study of Argumentation. [details] 

2008

  • van Eemeren, F. H., & Houtlosser, P. (2008). Más sobre falacias como descarrilamientos de maniobras estratégicas: el caso de 'tu quoque'. In C. Santibáñez Yáñez, & R. Marafioti (Eds.), De las falacias: argumentación y comunicación (pp. 37-51). (Ciencias del lenguaje). Buenos Aires: Biblos. [details] 
  • van Eemeren, F. H., & Houtlosser, P. (2008). The development of the pragma-dialectical approach to argumentation. In A. J. Aguayo, & T. R. Steffensmeier (Eds.), Readings on argumentation (pp. 12-25). Strata Publishing: State College, PA. [details] 

2007

  • van Eemeren, F. H. (2007). Consideren la brecha: Conciliando la búsqueda del éxito con la persistencia de la razonabilidad. In C. Santibánez Yánez, & B. Riffo Ocares (Eds.), Estudios en argumentación y retorica. Teorías contemporáneas y aplicaciones. (pp. 57-81). Concepcion: Editorial Universidad de Concepcion. [details] 
  • van Eemeren, F. H. (2007). Prefacio a la Segunda edición en Chile. In F. H. van Eemeren, & R. Grootendorst (Eds.), Argumentación, Communicatión y Falacias. Una Perspectiva Pragma-Dialectica (2nd ed). (pp. 17-18). Chile: Ediciones Universidad Católica de Chile. [details] 
  • van Eemeren, F. H., & Garssen, B. J. (2007). Kwantitatief emperisch onderzoek van argumentatie. Ter inleiding. Tijdschrift voor Taalbeheersing, 29(3), 193-195. [details] 
  • van Eemeren, F. H., & Grootendorst, R. (2007). Argumentación, comunicación y falacias. Una perspectiva pragma-dialéctica. Chili: Ediciones Universidad Católica de Chile. [details] 
  • van Eemeren, F. H., & Houtlosser, P. (2007). Argumentacija i razoumnost. In A. I. Migounov, & E. N. Lisanyuk (Eds.), Mysl'. Yearbook of the St. Petersburg Philosophical Society. (pp. 7-22). St. Petersburg: St. Petersburg University Press. [details] 
  • van Eemeren, F. H., & Houtlosser, P. (2007). Argumentation and reasonabless. Maintaining a delicate balance in strategic manoeuvring. Argumentation, interpretation, rhetoric: online journal. [details] 
  • van Eemeren, F. H., & Houtlosser, P. (2007). De retoriek van Willem van Oranje's 'Apologie' in dialectisch perspectief. In K. Korevaeart, H. Jansen, & J. de Jong (Eds.), Het woud van de retorica. Bundel voor Antoine Braet bij zijn afscheid van de Opleiding Nederlandse taal en cultuur van de Universiteit Leiden. (SNL reeks; No. 17). Leiden: Stichting Neerlandsitiek Leiden. [details] 
  • van Eemeren, F. H., & Houtlosser, P. (2007). Manobriando estratégicamente: Manteniendo un delicado balance. In C. Santibánez Yánez, & B. Riffo Ocares (Eds.), Estudios en argumentación y retórica. Teorías contemporáneas y aplicaciones. (pp. 83-121). Concepcion: Editorial Universidad de Concepcion. [details] 
  • van Eemeren, F. H., & Houtlosser, P. (2007). Preface special issue 'Perspectives on strategic maneuvering'. Argumentation, 20, 377-380. [details] 
  • van Eemeren, F. H., Blair, J. A., Willard, C. A., & Garssen, B. J. (2007). Preface. In F. H. van Eemeren, J. A. Blair, C. A. Willard, & B. Garssen (Eds.), Proceedings of the Sixth Conference of the International Society for the Study of Argumentation. (pp. xv). Amsterdam: Sic Sat. [details] 
  • van Eemeren, F. H., Houtlosser, P., & Snoeck Henkemans, A. F. (2007). Dialectical profiles and indicators of argumentative moves. In J. Anthony Blair, H. Hansen, R. Johnson, & C. Tindale (Eds.), Ontario Society for the Study of Argumentation (OSSA) Proceedings 2007 [CD-ROM]. Windsor: University of Windsor. [details] 
  • van Eemeren, F. H., Snoeck Henkemans, A. F., Pilgram, R., & Wagemans, J. H. M. (2007). Werkboek argumentatie: Inleiding in het analyseren, beoordelen en houden van betogen. Heerlen: Open Universiteit Nederland. [details] 

2016

  • Snoeck Henkemans, A. F., & van Eemeren, F. H. (2016). Argumentation: Analysis and evaluation. (2nd ed.) New York/London: Routledge/Taylor and Francis Group.

2012

  • van Eemeren, F. H., & Garssen, B. J. (2012). Some highlights in recent theorizing: an introduction. In F. H. van Eemeren, & B. Garssen (Eds.), Topical themes in argumentation theory: twenty exploratory studies (pp. 1-14). (Argumentation library; No. 22). Dordrecht: Springer. DOI: 10.1007/978-94-007-4041-9_1  [details] 
  • van Eemeren, F. H., & Garssen, B. (2012). Introduction. In F. H. van Eemeren, & B. Garssen (Eds.), Exploring argumentative contexts (pp. xiii-xx). (Argumentation in context; No. 4). Amsterdam: Benjamins. DOI: 10.1075/aic.4.002int  [details] 

2011

  • van Eemeren, F., Snoeck Henkemans, F., Pilgram, R., & Wagemans, J. (2011). Werkboek bij Argumentatie - 4e druk 2011 (op website). Groningen: Noordhoff.

Boekredactie

  • van Eemeren, F. H., Williams, D. C., & Zagar, I. Z. (2008). Understanding argumentation: work in progress. Amsterdam: Sic Sat-Rozenberg. [details] 
  • van Eemeren, F. H., & Garssen, B. (2008). Controversy and confrontation: relating controversy analysis with argumentation theory. (Controversies; No. 6). Amsterdam: Benjamins. [details] 

Spreker

  • Snoeck Henkemans, A.F. (speaker), van Eemeren, F.H. (speaker) & Houtlosser, P. (speaker) (8-6-2007): Dialectical Profiles and indicators of argumentative moves, Conference of the Ontario Society for the study of Argumentation at the University of Windsor, Windsor, Ontario.
  • van Eemeren, F.H. (speaker) (29-3-2007): Countering fallacious moves, Presentation at the 11th International Conference on Dialogue Analysis at the University of Münster, Münster.
This list of publications is extracted from the UvA-Current Research Information System. Questions? Ask the library  or the Pure staff  of your faculty / institute. Log in to Pure  to edit your publications. Log in to Personal Page Publication Selection tool  to manage the visibility of your publications on this list.

Geen nevenwerkzaamheden bekend

contactgegevens bewerken bewerk tabbladen