Voor de beste ervaring schakelt u JavaScript in en gebruikt u een moderne browser!
Je gebruikt een niet-ondersteunde browser. Deze site kan er anders uitzien dan je verwacht.

Dr. B.J. (Bart) Garssen

Faculteit der Geesteswetenschappen
Capaciteitsgroep Taalbeheersing, Argumentatietheorie en Retorica
Fotograaf: onbekend
Bezoekadres
  • Spuistraat 134
  • Kamernummer: 4.25
Postadres
  • Postbus 1637
    1000 BP Amsterdam
Contactgegevens
  • Profile
  • Publicaties

    2026

    • van Eemeren, F. H., & Garssen, B. (2026). Descriptive and analytical qualitative research of argumentative discourse. In C. Andone, M. Doury, S. Greco, K. Hannken-Illjes, & M. H. Reijven (Eds.), Qualitative Research Methods in Argumentation Studies (pp. 1-18). (Routledge Research in Communication Studies). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003502296-1 [details]
    • van Eemeren, F. H., Garssen, B., & Xie, Y. (2026). For your own good: A replication of hidden fallaciousness research. Journal of Argumentation in Context, 15(1), 1-22. https://doi.org/10.1075/jaic.25038.van [details]
    • van Eemeren, F., & Garssen, B. (2026). The Pragma-Dialectical Approach to Argumentation. In S. Aikin, J. Casey, & K. Stevens (Eds.), The Routledge Handbook of Argumentation Theory (pp. 54-62). (Routledge handbooks in philosophy). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003666851-8 [details]

    2024

    2023

    2022

    2021

    • Garssen, B. (2021). The Maxims of Common Sense: Strategic Manoeuvring with Figurative Analogies. In R. Boogaart, H. Jansen, & M. van Leeuwen (Eds.), The Language of Argumentation (pp. 213-227). (Argumentation Library; Vol. 36). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-52907-9_11 [details]
    • van Eemeren, F. H., Garssen, B., & labrie, N. (2021). Argumentation between Doctors and Patients: Understanding clinical argumentative discourse. John Benjamins Publishing Company. https://doi.org/10.1075/z.235 [details]

    2020

    2019

    • van Eemeren, F. H., & Garssen, B. (2019). And then you are left holding the baby! : Strategic manoeuvring with the argumentum ad consequentiam. In F. H. van Eemeren, & B. Garssen (Eds.), Argumentation in Actual Practice: Topical studies about argumentative discourse in context (pp. 321-334). (Argumentation in Context; Vol. 17). John Benjamins Publishing Company. https://doi.org/10.1075/aic.17.17van [details]
    • van Eemeren, F. H., & Garssen, B. (Eds.) (2019). Argumentation in Actual Practice: Topical studies about argumentative discourse in context. (Argumentation in Context ; Vol. 17). John Benjamins Publishing Company. https://doi.org/10.1075/aic.17 [details]

    2018

    • Garssen, B. (2018). “Metaphors are No Arguments, My Pretty Maiden”: The Pragma-Dialectical Reconstruction of Figurative. In S. Oswald, & D. Maillat (Eds.), Argumentation and Inference: Proceedings of the 2nd European Conference on Argumentation (Vol. 2, pp. 327-338). (Studies in logic; Vol. 77). College Publications. [details]

    2017

    • Garssen, B. (2017). Argumentative patterns with argumentation by example in legislative debate in the European Parliament. In F. H. van Eemeren (Ed.), Prototypical Argumentative Patterns: Exploring the relationship between argumentative discourse and institutional context (pp. 109-124). (Argumentation in context; Vol. 11). John Benjamins Publishing Company. https://doi.org/10.1075/aic.11.07gar [details]
    • Garssen, B. (2017). Strategic maneuvering in European Parliamentary debate. In F. H. van Eemeren, & W. Peng (Eds.), Contextualizing Pragma-Dialectics (pp. 145-158). (Argumentation in context; Vol. 12). John Benjamins. https://doi.org/10.1075/aic.12.09gar [details]
    • Garssen, B. (2017). The role of pragmatic problem-solving argumentation in plenary debate in the European Parliament. In F. H. van Eemeren (Ed.), Prototypical Argumentative Patterns: Exploring the relationship between argumentative discourse and institutional context (pp. 31-52). (Argumentation in context; Vol. 11). John Benjamins Publishing Company. https://doi.org/10.1075/aic.11.03gar [details]
    • Garssen, B. (2017). The role of the argument by example in legislative debates of the European Parliament. Journal of Argumentation in Context, 6(1), 27-43. https://doi.org/10.1075/jaic.6.1.02gar [details]

    2016

    • Garssen, B. (2016). Face the consequences! Strategic maneuvering with the argumentum ad consequentiam. In F. Paglieri, L. Bonelli, & S. Felletti (Eds.), The Psychology of Argument: Cognitive Approaches to Argumentation and Persuasion (pp. 245-253). (Studies in logic: Mathematical logic and foundations; Vol. 59). College Publications. [details]
    • Garssen, B. (2016). Problem-Solving Argumentative Patterns in Plenary Debates of the European Parliament. Argumentation, 30(1), 25-43. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10503-015-9378-y [details]

    2015

    • Garssen, B. (2015). Pragma-dialectics. In K. Tracy, C. Ilie, & T. Sandel (Eds.), The International Encyclopedia of Language and Social Interaction Wiley Blackwell. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118611463.wbielsi104 [details]
    • Garssen, B. (2015). Strategic maneuvering in European Parliamentary Debate. In M. Lewiński, & D. Mohammed (Eds.), Argumentation in political deliberation (pp. 33-46). (Benjamins current topics; No. 76). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. [details]
    • van Eemeren, F. H., & Garssen, B. (2015). Analysis and evaluation of argumentative discourse. In F. H. van Eemeren (Ed.), Reasonableness and Effectiveness in Argumentative Discourse: Fifty Contributions to the Development of Pragma-Dialectics (pp. 507-519). (Argumentation Library; No. 27). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-20955-5_26 [details]
    • van Eemeren, F. H., & Garssen, B. (2015). Exploiting the room for strategic maneuvering in argumentative discourse: Dealing with audience demand in the European Parliament. In F. H. van Eemeren (Ed.), Reasonableness and Effectiveness in Argumentative Discourse: Fifty Contributions to the Development of Pragma-Dialectics (pp. 859-872). (Argumentation Library; No. 27). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-20955-5_47 [details]
    • van Eemeren, F. H., & Garssen, B. (2015). In Varietate Concordia-United in diversity: European Parliamentary debate as an argumentative activity type. In F. H. van Eemeren (Ed.), Reasonableness and Effectiveness in Argumentative Discourse: Fifty Contributions to the Development of Pragma-Dialectics (pp. 843-858). (Argumentation Library; No. 27). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-20955-5_46 [details]
    • van Eemeren, F. H., & Garssen, B. (2015). Linguistic criteria for judging composition and division fallacies. In F. H. van Eemeren (Ed.), Reasonableness and Effectiveness in Argumentative Discourse: Fifty Contributions to the Development of Pragma-Dialectics (pp. 595-609). (Argumentation Library; No. 27). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-20955-5_31 [details]
    • van Eemeren, F. H., & Garssen, B. (2015). Reconstructing argumentative discourse with the help of speech act conditions. In F. H. van Eemeren (Ed.), Reasonableness and Effectiveness in Argumentative Discourse: Fifty Contributions to the Development of Pragma-Dialectics (pp. 469-486). (Argumentation Library; No. 27). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-20955-5_24 [details]
    • van Eemeren, F. H., & Garssen, B. (2015). Viewing the study of argumentation as normative pragmatics. In F. H. van Eemeren (Ed.), Reasonableness and Effectiveness in Argumentative Discourse: Fifty Contributions to the Development of Pragma-Dialectics (pp. 275-296). (Argumentation Library; No. 27). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-20955-5_14 [details]
    • van Eemeren, F. H., Garssen, B., & Meuffels, B. (2015). De vermomde ad baculum drogreden empirisch onderzocht. Tijdschrift voor Taalbeheersing, 37(1), 79-96. https://doi.org/10.1557/TVT2015.1.EEME [details]
    • van Eemeren, F. H., Garssen, B., & Meuffels, B. (2015). Effectiveness through reasonableness: A pragma-dialectical perspective. In F. H. van Eemeren (Ed.), Reasonableness and Effectiveness in Argumentative Discourse: Fifty Contributions to the Development of Pragma-Dialectics (pp. 771-791). (Argumentation Library; No. 27). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-20955-5_42 [details]
    • van Eemeren, F. H., Garssen, B., & Meuffels, B. (2015). The Disguised Ad Baculum Fallacy Empirically Investigated: Strategic Maneuvering With Threats. In B. Garssen, D. Godden, G. Mitchell, & F. Snoeck Henkemans (Eds.), International Society for the Study of Argumentation: 8th International Conference on Argumentation: July 1-July 4, 2014, University of Amsterdam, The Netherlands (pp. 1396-1407). Sic Sat. [details]
    • van Eemeren, F. H., Garssen, B., & Meuffels, B. (2015). The disguised abusive ad hominem empirically investigated: Strategic maneuvering with direct personal attacks. In F. H. van Eemeren (Ed.), Reasonableness and Effectiveness in Argumentative Discourse: Fifty Contributions to the Development of Pragma-Dialectics (pp. 793-811). (Argumentation Library; No. 27). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-20955-5_43 [details]
    • van Eemeren, F. H., Garssen, B., & Meuffels, B. (2015). The disguised ad baculum fallacy empirically investigated: Strategic maneuvering with threats. In F. H. van Eemeren (Ed.), Reasonableness and Effectiveness in Argumentative Discourse: Fifty Contributions to the Development of Pragma-Dialectics (pp. 813-824). (Argumentation Library; No. 27). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-20955-5_44 [details]
    • van Eemeren, F., Garssen, B., & Meuffels, B. (2015). Efectividad razonabele: pasos preliminares para una investicación pragma-dialéctica de la efectividad. In F. Leal Carretero (Ed.), Argumentación y pragma-dialéctica: estudios en honor a Frans van Eemeren (pp. 181-207). Editorial Universitaria Universidad de Guadalajara. [details]
    • van Eemeren, F., Garssen, B., & Meuffels, B. (2015). Investigación empírica del ad hominem abusivo: Maniobrar estratégico con ataques personales directos. In F. Leal Carretero (Ed.), Argumentación y pragma-dialéctica: estudios en honor a Frans van Eemeren (pp. 257-279). Editorial Universitaria Universidad de Guadalajara. [details]
    • van Eemeren, F., Garssen, B., & Meuffels, B. (2015). The extended pragma-dialectical argumentation theory empirically interpretated. In F. H. van Eemeren (Ed.), Reasonableness and Effectiveness in Argumentative Discourse: Fifty Contributions to the Development of Pragma-Dialectics (pp. 757-769). (Argumentation Library; No. 27). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-20955-5_41 [details]
    • van Eemeren, F., Garssen, B., & Wagemans, J. H. M. (2015). El método pragma-dialéctico de análisis y evaluación. In F. Leal Carretero (Ed.), Argumentación y pragma-dialéctica: estudios en honor a Frans van Eemeren (pp. 127-154). Editorial Universitaria Universidad de Guadalajara.

    2014

    2013

    2012

    • Garssen, B. (2012). Charges of inconsistency and the tu quoque fallacy. In H. Jales Ribeiro (Ed.), Inside arguments: logic and the study of argumentation (pp. 157-168). Cambridge Scholars. http://www.cambridgescholars.com/inside-arguments-16 [details]
    • van Eemeren, F. H., & Garssen, B. (2012). Exploiting the room for strategic maneuvering in argumentative discourse: dealing with audience demand in the European Parliament. In F. H. van Eemeren, & B. Garssen (Eds.), Exploring argumentative contexts (pp. 43-58). (Argumentation in context; No. 4). Benjamins. https://doi.org/10.1075/aic.4.03van [details]
    • van Eemeren, F. H., Garssen, B., & Meuffels, B. (2012). De vermomde 'abusive ad hominem'-drogreden empirisch onderzocht: strategisch manoeuvreren met directe persoonlijke aanvallen. Tijdschrift voor Taalbeheersing, 34(2), 135-155. https://doi.org/10.5117/TVT2012.2.DE_V423 [details]
    • van Eemeren, F. H., Garssen, B., & Meuffels, B. (2012). Effectiveness through reasonableness: a pragma-dialectical perspective: preliminary steps to pragma-dialectical effectiveness research. Argumentation, 26(1), 33-53. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10503-011-9234-7 [details]
    • van Eemeren, F. H., Garssen, B., & Meuffels, B. (2012). The disguised 'abusive ad hominem' empirically investigated: strategic manoeuvring with direct personal attacks. Thinking and Reasoning, 18(3), 344-364. https://doi.org/10.1080/13546783.2012.678666 [details]
    • van Eemeren, F. H., Garssen, B., & Meuffels, B. (2012). The extended pragma-dialectical argumentation theory empirically interpreted. In F. H. Eemeren, & B. Garssen (Eds.), Topical themes in argumentation theory: twenty exploratory studies (pp. 323-343). (Argumentation library; No. 22). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-4041-9_21 [details]

    2011

    • Garssen, B., & Kienpointner, M. (2011). Figurative analogy in political argumentation. In E. Feteris, B. Garssen, & F. Snoeck Henkemans (Eds.), Keeping in touch with pragma-dialectics: in honor of Frans H. van Eemeren (pp. 39-58). Benjamins. [details]
    • Visser, J., Bex, F., Reed, C., & Garssen, B. (2011). Correspondence between the pragma-dialectical discussion model and the argument interchange format. Studies in Logic, Grammar and Rhetoric, 23(36), 189-224. http://logika.uwb.edu.pl/studies/vol36.html [details]
    • van Eemeren, F. H., Garssen, B., & Wagemans, J. H. M. (2011). The pragma-dialectical method of analysis. In R. C. Rowland (Ed.), Reasoned argument and social change: selected papers from the 17th Biennial Conference on Argumentation (pp. 25-47). National Communication Association. [details]
    • van Eemeren, F., Garssen, B., & Meuffels, B. (2011). The extended pragma-dialectical argumentation theory empirically interpreted. In F. H. van Eemeren, B. Garssen, D. Godden, & G. Mitchell (Eds.), Proceedings of the 7th Conference of the International Society for the Study of Argumentation (pp. 411-422). Rozenberg/Sic Sat. [details]

    2010

    • Garssen, B., & van Laar, J. A. (2010). A pragma-dialectical response to objectivist epistemic challenges. Informal logic, 30(2), 122-141. http://ojs.uwindsor.ca/ojs/leddy/index.php/informal_logic/article/view/2891/2404 [details]
    • van Eemeren, F. H., & Garssen, B. (2010). 'In varietate concordia' - United in diversity: European parliamentary debate as an argumentative activity type. Controversia, 7(1), 19-37. [details]
    • van Eemeren, F. H., & Garssen, B. (2010). Constraints on political deliberation: European parliamentary debate as an argumentative activity type. In D. S. Gouran (Ed.), The functions of argument and social context: selected papers from the 16th Biennial Conference on Argumentation (pp. 505-514). National Communication Association. http://altaconference.org/contents/Alta16.html [details]
    • van Eemeren, F. H., & Garssen, B. (2010). Linguistic criteria for judging composition and division fallacies. In A. Capone (Ed.), Perspectives on language use and pragmatics: a volume in memory of Sorin Stati (pp. 35-50). (LINCOM studies in pragmatics; No. 16). Lincom Europa. [details]
    • van Eemeren, F., Garssen, B., & Meuffels, B. (2010). De uitgebreide pragma-dialectische argumentatietheorie empirisch geïnterpreteerd. Tijdschrift voor Taalbeheersing, 32(1), 49-62. https://doi.org/10.5117/TVT2010.1.DE_U370 [details]

    2009

    • Garssen, B. (2009). Ad hominem in disguise: strategic manoeuvring with direct personal attacks. Argumentation and Advocacy, 45(4), 207-213. http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=ufh&AN=47710427&site=ehost-live [details]
    • Garssen, B. (2009). Comparing the incomparable: figurative analogies in a dialectical testing procedure. In F. H. van Eemeren, & B. Garssen (Eds.), Pondering on problems of argumentation: twenty essays on theoretical issues (pp. 133-140). (Argumentation library; No. 14). Springer. [details]
    • Garssen, B., & van Laar, J. A. (2009). De pragma-dialectiek en de objectieve epistemische benadering van argumentatie. In W. Spooren, M. Onrust, & J. Sanders (Eds.), Studies in taalbeheersing 3 (pp. 73-83). Van Gorcum. [details]
    • van Eemeren, F. H., & Garssen, B. (2009). Analysis and evaluation of argumentative discourse. In J. Renkema (Ed.), Discourse, of course: an overview of research in discourse studies (pp. 171-184). Benjamins. [details]
    • van Eemeren, F. H., & Garssen, B. (2009). Putting pragma-dialectics into practice. In J. Sobocan, & L. Groarke (Eds.), Critical thinking education and assessment: can higher order thinking be tested? (pp. 247-262). Althouse. [details]
    • van Eemeren, F. H., & Garssen, B. (2009). The fallacies of composition and division revisited. Cogency, 1(1), 23-42. http://www.cogency.udp.cl/ediciones/1/Cogency_v1_n1_03.pdf [details]
    • van Eemeren, F., Garssen, B., & Meuffels, B. (2009). Fallacies and judgments of reasonableness: empirical research concerning the pragma-dialectical discussion rules. (Argumentation library; No. 16). Springer. [details]

    2008

    2007

    • Garssen, B. J. (2007). Comparing the incomparable: Figurative analogies in a dialectical testing procedure. In F. H. van Eemeren, J. A. Blair, C. A. Willard, & B. J. Garssen (Eds.), Proceedings of the Sixth Conference of the International Society for the Study of Argumentation (pp. 437-440). Amsterdam: Sic Sat.
    • Garssen, B. J. (2007). Esquemas argumentativos (translation). In R. Marafioti (Ed.), Parlamentos. Teoría de la argumentación y debate parlamentario Buenos Aires: Editorial Biblos.
    • van Eemeren, F. H., Garssen, B. J., & Meuffels, B. (2007). Convergent operations in empirical ad hominem research. In F. H. van Eemeren, J. A. Blair, C. A. Willard, & B. Garssen (Eds.), Proceedings of the Sixth Conference of the International Society for the Study of Argumentation (pp. 367-373). Amsterdam: Sic Sat. [details]
    • van Eemeren, F. H., Garssen, B., & Meuffels, B. (2007). De conventionele deugdelijkheid van de pragma-dialectische discussieregels. Tijdschrift voor Taalbeheersing, 29(3), 251-274. http://taalbeheersing.letterentijdschriften.nl/index.php?url=article&atc_id=63 [details]

    2006

    • Garssen, B. J. (2006). Beweringen met nare consequenties: twee varianten van het argumentum ad consequentiam. In B. J. Garssen, & F. H. Snoeck Henkemans (Eds.), De redelijkheid zelve. Tien pragma-dialectische opstellen voor Frans van Eemeren Amsterdam: Rozenberg.
    • Garssen, B. J., van Eemeren, F. H., & Meuffels, B. (2006). This can't be true, that would be terrible: Ordinary arguers judgments about ad consequentiam fallacies. In C. A. Willard (Ed.), Critical Problems in Argumentation. Selected Papers (pp. 669-675). Washington DC: National Communication Association. [details]
    • van Eemeren, F. H., Garssen, B., & Meuffels, B. (2006). Apples and oranges, peer pressure, and other such troublemakers: ordinary arguers' opinions about violations of the pragma-dialectical argument scheme rule. In P. Riley, & C. Willis-Chun (Eds.), Engaging argument: selected papers from the 2005 NCA/AFA Summer Conference on Argumentation: sponsored by the National Communication Association, the American Forensics Association, and the University of Utah (pp. 445-452). Washington, DC: National Communication Association. [details]
    • van Eemeren, F. H., Garssen, B., & Meuffels, B. (2006). La validez convencional de la regla pragma-dialectica de libertad. Praxis, 9, 17-32.

    2022

    2019

    2015

    2013

    • van Eemeren, F. H., & Garssen, B. (2013). Viewing the study of argumentation as normative pragmatics. In A. Capone, F. Lo Piparo, & M. Carapezza (Eds.), Perspectives on pragmatics and philosophy (pp. 515-536). (Perspectives in Pragmatics, Philosophy & Psychology; No. 1). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-01011-3_24 [details]
    • van Eemeren, F. H., Garssen, B., & Meuffels, B. (2013). De vermomde abusive ad hominem empirisch onderzocht: strategisch manoeuvreren met directe persoonlijke aanvallen. In R. Boogaart, & H. Jansen (Eds.), Studies in taalbeheersing 4 (pp. 81-90). Koninklijke Van Gorcum. [details]

    2012

    • van Eemeren, F. H., & Garssen, B. (2012). Exploring argumentative contexts. (Argumentation in context; No. 4). Amsterdam: Benjamins. [details]
    • van Eemeren, F. H., & Garssen, B. (2012). Topical themes in argumentation theory: twenty exploratory studies. (Argumentation library; No. 22). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-4041-9 [details]
    • van Eemeren, F. H., & Garssen, B. (2012). Dialogue rules for argumentation. In S. Cantarini (Ed.), Dialogue: state of the art: studies in memory of Sorin Stati (pp. 272-286). (LINCOM studies in pragmatics; No. 22). Lincom Europa. [details]
    • van Eemeren, F. H., & Garssen, B. (2012). Strategic maneuvering in political argumentation: the plenary debate in the European Parliament as an argumentative activity type. In M. Constantinescu, G. Stoica, & O. Uţă Bărbulescu (Eds.), Modernitate și interdisciplinaritate în cercetarea lingvistică: omagiu doamnei profesor Liliana Ionescu-Ruxăndoiu (pp. 227-241). Editura Universităţii din București. http://editura-unibuc.ro/?p=1772 [details]

    2011

    • Feteris, E., Garssen, B., & Snoeck Henkemans, F. (2011). Keeping in touch with pragma-dialectics: in honor of Frans H. van Eemeren. John Benjamins. [details]
    • Feteris, E., Garssen, B., & Snoeck Henkemans, F. (2011). Introduction. In E. Feteris, B. Garssen, & F. Snoeck Henkemans (Eds.), Keeping in touch with pragma-dialectics: in honor of Frans H. van Eemeren (pp. 1-4). John Benjamins. [details]

    2009

    • van Eemeren, F. H., & Garssen, B. (2009). 'In varietate concordia' - United in diversity: European parliamentary debate as an argumentative activity type. In J. Ritola (Ed.), Argument cultures: proceedings of OSSA '09 Ontario Society for the Study of Argumentation. http://scholar.uwindsor.ca/ossaarchive/OSSA8/papersandcommentaries/39/ [details]
    • van Eemeren, F. H., & Garssen, B. (2009). Pondering on problems of argumentation: twenty essays on theoretical issues. Springer. [details]

    2008

    • van Eemeren, F. H., & Garssen, B. (2008). Controversy and confrontation: relating controversy analysis with argumentation theory. (Controversies; No. 6). Amsterdam: Benjamins. [details]

    2007

    • Garssen, B. J. (2007). Argumenten in lijn. Een mening met een kaart funderen. Tekst[blad], 13(3), 16-19.
    • van Eemeren, F. H., & Garssen, B. J. (2007). Kwantitatief emperisch onderzoek van argumentatie. Ter inleiding. Tijdschrift voor Taalbeheersing, 29(3), 193-195. [details]
    • van Eemeren, F. H., Blair, J. A., Willard, C. A., & Garssen, B. J. (2007). Proceedings of the Sixth Conference of the International Society for the Study of Argumentation. Amsterdam: Sic Sat. [details]
    • van Eemeren, F. H., Blair, J. A., Willard, C. A., & Garssen, B. J. (2007). Preface. In F. H. van Eemeren, J. A. Blair, C. A. Willard, & B. Garssen (Eds.), Proceedings of the Sixth Conference of the International Society for the Study of Argumentation (pp. xv). Amsterdam: Sic Sat. [details]

    2006

    • Snoeck Henkemans, A. F., & Garssen, B. J. (2006). De redelijkheid zelve. Tien pragma-dialectische opstellen voor Frans van Eemeren. Amsterdam: Rozenberg Publications. [details]

    2024

    2020

    • van Eemeren, F. H., & Garssen, B. (2020). A variety of contributions to argumentation theory. In F. H. van Eemeren, & B. Garssen (Eds.), From Argument Schemes to Argumentative Relations in the Wild: A Variety of Contributions to Argumentation Theory (pp. 1-10). (Argumentation Library; Vol. 35). Springer. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-28367-4_1 [details]

    2019

    • van Eemeren, F. H., & Garssen, B. (2019). A collection of studies of argumentation in practice. In F. H. van Eemeren, & B. Garssen (Eds.), Argumentation in Actual Practice: Topical studies about argumentative discourse in context (pp. 1-12). (Argumentation in Context; Vol. 17). John Benjamins Publishing Company. https://doi.org/10.1075/aic.17.01van [details]

    2014

    • Garssen, B. (2014). Boekbesprekingen van Šorm (2010) en Timmers (2014) [Bespreking van: E. Šorm (2010) The good, the bad and the persuasive: normative quality and actual persuasivenes of arguments from authority, arguments from cause to effect and arguments from example; R.H.M. Timmers (2014) De wapens van de lezer: criteria voor argumentkwaliteit en de overtuigingskracht van argumentatie op basis van autoriteit, analogie en voor- en nadelen]. Tijdschrift voor Taalbeheersing, 36(3), 324-330. https://doi.org/10.1557/TVT2014.3.DAZE [details]

    2012

    • van Eemeren, F. H., & Garssen, B. (2012). Introduction. In F. H. van Eemeren, & B. Garssen (Eds.), Exploring argumentative contexts (pp. xiii-xx). (Argumentation in context; No. 4). Benjamins. https://doi.org/10.1075/aic.4.002int [details]
    • van Eemeren, F. H., & Garssen, B. J. (2012). Some highlights in recent theorizing: an introduction. In F. H. van Eemeren, & B. Garssen (Eds.), Topical themes in argumentation theory: twenty exploratory studies (pp. 1-14). (Argumentation library; No. 22). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-4041-9_1 [details]

    2010

    Andere

    • Garssen, B. (organiser) (7-2023). ISSA conference 2023, Leiden (organising a conference, workshop, ...).
    • Garssen, B. (organiser) (14-9-2022). Argumentative style. Colloquium on argumentative style (organising a conference, workshop, ...).
    • Andone, C. (organiser) & Garssen, B. (organiser) (7-10-2021). Argumentation in European Politics (organising a conference, workshop, ...).
    • Garssen, B. (organiser) (3-7-2018 - 6-7-2018). Conference organization, Amsterdam. 9th ISSA Conference (organising a conference, workshop, ...).
    This list of publications is extracted from the UvA-Current Research Information System. Questions? Ask the library or the Pure staff of your faculty / institute. Log in to Pure to edit your publications. Log in to Personal Page Publication Selection tool to manage the visibility of your publications on this list.
  • Nevenwerkzaamheden
    • Geen nevenwerkzaamheden
contactgegevens bewerken   bewerk profielinformatie