Voor de beste ervaring schakelt u JavaScript in en gebruikt u een moderne browser!
Je gebruikt een niet-ondersteunde browser. Deze site kan er anders uitzien dan je verwacht.

Dr. R. (Ronald) de Haan

Faculteit der Natuurwetenschappen, Wiskunde en Informatica
ILLC

Bezoekadres
  • Science Park 900
  • Kamernummer: L6.34
Postadres
  • Postbus 94242
    1090 GE Amsterdam
Contactgegevens
  • Publicaties

    2023

    • Botan, S., de Haan, R., Slavkovik, M., & Terzopoulou, Z. (2023). Egalitarian judgment aggregation. Autonomous Agents and Multi-Agent Systems, 37(1), Article 16. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10458-023-09598-6
    • Pinto Prieto, D., de Haan, R., & Özgün, A. (2023). A Belief Model for Conflicting and Uncertain Evidence: Connecting Dempster-Shafer Theory and the Topology of Evidence. In P. Marquis, T. C. Son, & G. Kern-Isberner (Eds.), Proceedings of the 20th International Conference on Principles of Knowledge Representation and Reasoning: Rhodes, Greece. September 2-8, 2023 (pp. 552-561). (KR; Vol. 2023). IJCAI. https://doi.org/10.24963/kr.2023/54 [details]
    • Rey, S., Endriss, U., & de Haan, R. (2023). A general framework for participatory budgeting with additional constraints. Social Choice and Welfare. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00355-023-01462-6
    • Wareham, T., de Haan, R., Vardy, A., & van Rooij, I. (2023). Swarm Control for Distributed Construction: A Computational Complexity Perspective. Transactions on Human-Robot Interaction, 12(1), Article 6. https://doi.org/10.1145/3555078 [details]

    2022

    • Aziz, H., Biró, P., Fleiner, T., Gaspers, S., de Haan, R., Mattei, N., & Rastegari, B. (2022). Stable Matching with Uncertain Pairwise Preferences. Theoretical Computer Science, 909, 1-11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tcs.2022.01.028 [details]
    • Boixel, A., Endriss, U., & de Haan, R. (2022). A Calculus for Computing Structured Justifications for Election Outcomes. In K. Sycara, V. Honavar, & M. Spaan (Eds.), Proceedings of the 36th AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence: AAAI-22 : virtual conference, Vancouver, Canada, February 22-March 1, 2022 (Vol. 5, pp. 4859-4866). AAAI Press. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1609/aaai.v36i5.20414 [details]
    • Chingoma, J., Endriss, U., & de Haan, R. (2022). Simulating Multiwinner Voting Rules in Judgment Aggregation. In AAMAS '22: Proceedings of the 21st International Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems : May 9-13, 2022, virtual event, New Zealand (Vol. 1, pp. 263-271). International Foundation for Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems. https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.5555/3535850.3535881 [details]
    • Pinto Prieto, D., & de Haan, R. (2022). Using hierarchies to efficiently combine evidence with Dempster's rule of combination. Proceedings of Machine Learning Research, 180, 1634-1643. https://openreview.net/forum?id=H3zMYwUsqeq [details]

    2021

    • Boixel, A., & de Haan, R. (2021). On the Complexity of Finding Justifications for Collective Decisions. In AAAI-21, IAAI-21, EAAI-21 proceedings: a virtual conference, February 2-9, 2021 : Thirty-Fifth AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence, Thirty-Third Conference on Innovative Applications of Articicial Intelligence, Eleventh Symposium on Educational Advances in Artificial Intelligence (Vol. 6, pp. 5194-5201). (Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence; Vol. 35). AAAI Press. https://doi.org/10.1609/aaai.v35i6.16656 [details]
    • Botan, S., de Haan, R., Slavkovik, M., & Terzopoulou, Z. (2021). Egalitarian Judgment Aggregation. In U. Endriss, A. Nowé, F. Dignum, & A. Lomuscio (Eds.), AAMAS '21: Proceedings of the 20th International Conference on Autonomous Agents and MultiAgent Systems : May 3-7, 2021, virtual event, UK (Vol. 1, pp. 214-222). International Foundation for Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems. https://www.ifaamas.org/Proceedings/aamas2021/pdfs/p214.pdf [details]
    • Bracciali, A., Grossi, D., & de Haan, R. (2021). Decentralization in Open Quorum Systems: Limitative Results for Ripple and Stellar. In E. Anceaume, C. Bisière, M. Bouvard, Q. Bramas, & C. Casamatta (Eds.), 2nd International Conference on Blockchain Economics, Security and Protocols: Tokenomics 2020, October 26-27, 2020, Toulouse, France Article 5 (OASIcs - Open Access Series in Informatics; Vol. 82). Schloss Dagstuhl - Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik. https://doi.org/10.4230/OASIcs.Tokenomics.2020.5 [details]
    • Dorn, B., de Haan, R., & Schlotter, I. (2021). Obtaining a Proportional Allocation by Deleting Items. Algorithmica, 83(5), 1559–1603. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00453-020-00794-4 [details]
    • Rey, S., Endriss, U., & de Haan, R. (2021). Shortlisting Rules and Incentives in an End-to-End Model for Participatory Budgeting. In Z-H. Zhou (Ed.), Proceedings of the Thirtieth International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence: IJCAI 2021, virtual event : Montreal, 19-27 August 2021 (pp. 370-376). International Joint Conferences on Artificial Intelligence. https://doi.org/10.24963/ijcai.2021/52 [details]
    • Rich, P., Blokpoel, M., de Haan, R., Otworowska, M., Sweers, M., Wareham, T., & van Rooij, I. (2021). Naturalism, tractability and the adaptive toolbox. Synthese, 198(6), 5749–5784. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-019-02431-2 [details]
    • Rich, P., de Haan, R., Wareham, T., & van Rooij, I. (2021). How hard is cognitive science? In 43rd Annual Meeting of the Cognitive Science Society (CogSci 2021): Comparative Cognition Animal Minds : Vienna, Austria, 26-29 July 2021 (Vol. 5, pp. 3034-3040). (Proceedings of the Annual Meeting of the Cognitive Science Society; Vol. 43). Cognitive Science Society. https://escholarship.org/uc/item/8cr8x1c4 [details]
    • Woensdregt, M., Spike, M., de Haan, R., Wareham, T., van Rooij, I., & Blokpoel, M. (2021). Why is scaling up models of language evolution hard? In 43rd Annual Meeting of the Cognitive Science Society (CogSci 2021): Comparative Cognition Animal Minds : Vienna, Austria, 26-29 July 2021 (Vol. 1, pp. 209-215). (Proceedings of the Annual Meeting of the Cognitive Science Society; Vol. 43). Cognitive Science Society. https://escholarship.org/uc/item/021734q4 [details]

    2020

    2019

    • Aziz, H., Biro, P., de Haan, R., & Rastegari, B. (2019). Pareto Optimal Allocation under Compact Uncertain Preferences. In Thirty-Third AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence, Thirty-First Conference on Innovative Applications of Artificial Intelligence, The Ninth Symposium on Educational Advances in Artificial Intelligence: AAAI-19, IAAI-19, EAAI-20 : January 27-February 1, 2019, Hilton Hawaiian Village, Honolulu, Hawaii, USA (pp. 1740-1747). (Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence; Vol. 33). AAAI Press. https://doi.org/10.1609/aaai.v33i01.33011740 [details]
    • Aziz, H., Biró, P., de Haan, R., & Rastegari, B. (2019). Pareto Optimal Allocation under Uncertain Preferences: Uncertainty Models, Algorithms, and Complexity. Artificial Intelligence, 276, 57-78. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.artint.2019.08.002 [details]
    • de Haan, R. (2019). Parameterized Complexity in the Polynomial Hierarchy: Extending Parameterized Complexity Theory to Higher Levels of the Hierarchy. (Lecture Notes in Computer Science; Vol. 11880), (FoLLI Publications on Logic, Language and Information). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-60670-4 [details]
    • de Haan, R., & Slavkovik, M. (2019). Answer Set Programming for Judgment Aggregation. In S. Kraus (Ed.), Proceedings of the Twenty-Eighth International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence: IJCAI-19 : Macao, 10-16 August 2019 (pp. 1668-1674). International Joint Conferences on Artificial Intelligence. https://doi.org/10.24963/ijcai.2019/231 [details]
    • de Haan, R., & Szeider, S. (2019). A Compendium of Parameterized Problems at Higher Levels of the Polynomial Hierarchy. Algorithms, 12(9), Article 188. https://doi.org/10.3390/a12090188 [details]
    • de Haan, R., & Szymanik, J. (2019). Characterizing polynomial Ramsey quantifiers. Mathematical Structures in Computer Science, 29(6), 896-908. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0960129518000397 [details]
    • van Rooij, I., Blokpoel, M., de Haan, R., & Wareham, T. (2019). Tractable embodied computation needs embeddedness. Reti, Saperi, Linguaggi, 6(1), 25-38. https://doi.org/10.12832/94728, https://doi.org/10.12832/94728 [details]

    2018

    • Döcker, J., Dorn, B., Endriss, U., de Haan, R., & Schneckenburger, S. (2018). Tool Auctions. In Proceedings of the Thirty-Second AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence, Thirtieth Innovative Applications of Artificial Intelligence Conference, Eighth Symposium on Educational Advances in Artificial Intelligence: 2-7 February 2018, New Orleans, Louisiana, USA (pp. 1015-1022). AAAI Press. https://aaai.org/ocs/index.php/AAAI/AAAI18/paper/view/17186 [details]
    • de Haan, R. (2018). A Parameterized Complexity View on Description Logic Reasoning. In M. Thielscher, F. Toni, & F. Wolter (Eds.), Principles of Knowledge Representation and Reasoning: Proceedings of the Sixteenth International Conference (KR2018): Tempe, Arizona, 30 October-2 November 2018 (pp. 359-368). AAAI Press. https://arxiv.org/abs/1808.03852 [details]
    • de Haan, R. (2018). Hunting for Tractable Languages for Judgment Aggregation. In M. Thielscher, F. Toni, & F. Wolter (Eds.), Principles of Knowledge Representation and Reasoning: Proceedings of the Sixteenth International Conference (KR2018): Tempe, Arizona, 30 October-2 November 2018 (pp. 194-203). AAAI Press. https://arxiv.org/abs/1808.03043 [details]
    • de Haan, R., & Wolf, P. (2018). Restricted Power - Computational Complexity Results for Strategic Defense Games. In H. Ito, S. Leonardi, L. Pagli, & G. Prencipe (Eds.), 9th International Conference on Fun with Algorithms: FUN 2018, June 13-15, 2016, La Maddalena Island, Italy Article 17 (Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics; Vol. 100). Schloss Dagstuhl - Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik. https://doi.org/10.4230/LIPIcs.FUN.2018.17 [details]

    2017

    • Aziz, H., Biró, P., Fleiner, T., Gaspers, S., de Haan, R., Mattei, N., & Rastegari, B. (2017). Stable Matching with Uncertain Pairwise Preferences. In S. Das, E. Durfee, K. Larson, & M. Winikoff (Eds.), AAMAS '17: proceedings of the 16th International Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems : May, 8-12, 2017, São Paulo, Brazil (Vol. 1, pp. 344-352). International Foundation for Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems. http://www.aamas-conference.org/Proceedings/aamas2017/pdfs/p344.pdf [details]
    • Aziz, H., de Haan, R., & Rastegari, B. (2017). Pareto Optimal Allocation under Compact Uncertain Preferences. In C. Sierra (Ed.), Proceedings of the Twenty-Sixth International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence (IJCAI-17): Melbourne, Australia, 19-25 August 2017 (pp. 77-83). International Joint Conferences on Artificial Intelligence. https://doi.org/10.24963/ijcai.2017/12 [details]
    • Aziz, H., de Haan, R., & Rastegari, B. (2017). Pareto Optimal Allocation under Uncertain Preferences. In Proceedings of the 26th International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence (IJCAI 2017): Melbourne, Australia 19-25 August 2017 (pp. 77-83). International Joint Conferences on Artificial Intelligence. https://doi.org/10.24963/ijcai.2017/12 [details]
    • Aziz, H., de Haan, R., & Rastegari, B. (2017). Pareto Optimal Allocation under Uncertain Preferences. In S. Das, E. Durfee, K. Larson, & M. Winikoff (Eds.), AAMAS '17: proceedings of the 16th International Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems : May, 8-12, 2017, São Paulo, Brazil (Vol. 3, pp. 1472-1474 ). International Foundation for Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems. https://dl.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=3091333 [details]
    • Dorn, B., de Haan, R., & Schlotter, I. (2017). Obtaining a Proportional Allocation by Deleting Items. In J. Röthe (Ed.), Algorithmic Decision Theory: 5th International Conference, ADT 2017, Luxembourg, Luxembourg, October 25–27, 2017 : proceedings (pp. 284-299). (Lecture Notes in Computer Science; Vol. 10576), (Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-67504-6_20 [details]
    • de Haan, R. (2017). Complexity Results for Manipulation, Bribery and Control of the Kemeny Judgment Aggregation Procedure. In S. Das, E. Durfee, K. Larson, & M. Winikoff (Eds.), AAMAS '17: proceedings of the 16th International Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems : May, 8-12, 2017, São Paulo, Brazil (Vol. 2, pp. 1151-1159). International Foundation for Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems. http://www.aamas-conference.org/Proceedings/aamas2017/pdfs/p1151.pdf [details]
    • de Haan, R., & Slavkovik, M. (2017). Complexity Results for Aggregating Judgments using Scoring or Distance-Based Procedures. In S. Das, E. Durfee, K. Larson, & M. Winikoff (Eds.), AAMAS '17: proceedings of the 16th International Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems : May, 8-12, 2017, São Paulo, Brazil (Vol. 2, pp. 952-961). International Foundation for Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems. http://www.aamas-conference.org/Proceedings/aamas2017/pdfs/p952.pdf [details]
    • de Haan, R., & Szeider, S. (2017). Parameterized Complexity Classes Beyond para-NP. Journal of Computer and System Sciences, 87, 16-57. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcss.2017.02.002 [details]
    • de Haan, R., Kanj, I., & Szeider, S. (2017). On the Parameterized Complexity of Finding Small Unsatisfiable Subsets of CNF Formulas and CSP Instances. ACM Transactions on Computational Logic, 18(3), Article 21. https://doi.org/10.1145/3091528 [details]

    2016

    2015

    • Endriss, U., & de Haan, R. (2015). Complexity of the Winner Determination Problem in Judgment Aggregation: Kemeny, Slater, Tideman, Young. In AAMAS '15: proceedings of the 2015 International Conference on Autonomous Agents & Multiagent Systems : May, 4-8, 2015, Istanbul, Turkey (Vol. 1, pp. 117-125). International Foundation for Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems. http://www.aamas-conference.org/Proceedings/aamas2015/aamas/p117.pdf [details]
    • Endriss, U., de Haan, R., & Szeider, S. (2015). Parameterized Complexity Results for Agenda Safety in Judgment Aggregation. In AAMAS '15: proceedings of the 2015 International Conference on Autonomous Agents & Multiagent Systems : May, 4-8, 2015, Istanbul, Turkey (Vol. 1, pp. 127-136). International Foundation for Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems. http://www.aamas-conference.org/Proceedings/aamas2015/aamas/p127.pdf [details]
    • de Haan, R., & Szymanik, J. (2015). A dichotomy result for Ramsey quantifiers. In V. de Paiva, R. de Queiroz, L. S. Moss, D. Leivant, & A. G. de Oliveira (Eds.), Logic, Language, Information, and Computation: 22nd International Workshop, WoLLIC 2015, Bloomington, IN, USA, July 20-23, 2015 : proceedings (pp. 69-80). (Lecture Notes in Computer Science; Vol. 9160), (FoLLI Publications on Logic, Language and Information). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-47709-0_6 [details]

    2020

    • Boixel, A., & de Haan, R. (2020). On the Complexity of Finding Justifications for Collective Decisions. Poster session presented at 17th International Conference on Principles of Knowledge Representation and Reasoning (KR 2020), Rhodes, Greece.

    2023

    • Rey, S. J. (2023). Variations on participatory budgeting. [Thesis, fully internal, Universiteit van Amsterdam]. [details]

    2021

    • Botan, S. (2021). Strategyproof social choice for restricted domains. [Thesis, fully internal, Universiteit van Amsterdam]. Institute for Logic, Language and Computation. [details]
    This list of publications is extracted from the UvA-Current Research Information System. Questions? Ask the library or the Pure staff of your faculty / institute. Log in to Pure to edit your publications. Log in to Personal Page Publication Selection tool to manage the visibility of your publications on this list.
  • Nevenwerkzaamheden
    Geen nevenwerkzaamheden