Voor de beste ervaring schakelt u JavaScript in en gebruikt u een moderne browser!
EN

dhr. dr. J.H.M. (Jean) Wagemans

Faculteit der Geesteswetenschappen
Faculteit der Geesteswetenschappen

Bezoekadres
  • Spuistraat 134
  • Kamernummer:511
Postadres
  • Postbus 1637
    1000 BP Amsterdam
  • Informatie over Jean Wagemans

     

    Over Jean Wagemans

    Dr Jean Wagemans is een filosoof die gespecialiseerd is in retorica, argumentatie en debat. Hij behaalde een MA in de Wijsbegeerte (cum laude, 2001) en een PhD in de Argumentatietheorie (2009) aan de Universiteit van Amsterdam en werkt momenteel als senior onderzoeker bij het Amsterdam Centre for Language and Communication (ACLC).

    Wagemans is de bedenker van het Periodiek Systeem der Argumenten, een omvattend overzicht van de technieken die mensen gebruiken om anderen van hun standpunt te overtuigen met toepassingen in de formele linguïstiek, computationele argumentatie, rhetoric-checking en explainable artificial intelligence (XAI). Hij neemt deel aan het door RPA Human (e) AI gefinancierd onderzoeksproject Towards an Epistemological and Ethical XAI, het door NWO gefinancierde onderzoeksproject Resistance to Metaphor en de door HORIZON 2020 gefinancierde COST action APPLY – European network for argumentation and public policy analysis. Wagemans is co-auteur van het Handbook of Argumentation Theory (2014) en van Argumentatie en debat (2014). Zijn andere publicaties omvatten wetenschappelijke artikelen, boekrecensies en populariserende columns.

    Wagemans is voorzitter pro tem van de Capaciteitsgroep Taalbeheersing, argumentatietheorie en retorica van de Universiteit van Amsterdam. Hij verzorgt colleges over argumentatie op BA, MA en RMA niveau en begeleidt tutorials en scripties. Wagemans verschijnt regelmatig in de media om te praten over zijn onderzoek en om commentaar te geven op de actualiteit. Hij is lid van de redactieraad van het tijdschrift Argumentation en recensent voor Informal Logic, Argument & Computation, Journal of Argumentation in Context en andere wetenschappelijke tijdschriften. Wagemans was mede-organisator van de ISSA 9th International Conference on Argumentation en was lid van de wetenschappelijke panels van ECA 2, ARGAGE 2018, DIS 3 en andere conferenties in het veld.

    Click here to read the English version of these pages

    Overzicht van de colleges gegeven door dr. J.H.M. Wagemans (docent 7007)

  • Nieuws
    Photo by Lauren Hillebrandt.

    AI detects a fallacy

    February 22, 2020

    Three Amsterdam philosophers and a programmer have an ambitious plan: to develop an argumentation machine that helps to recognize false reasoning from speeches by Donald Trump or Greta Thunberg, for example. Interview by Maarten van Gestel.

    Read the newspaper article (in Dutch).

    Finalists of the Amsterdam Science & Innovation Award 2019

    October 22, 2019

    Federica Russo, Jean Wagemans and Federico Gobbo are nominated for receiving the Amsterdam Science & Innovation Award 2019 in the category Alpha / Gamma with their project "KRINO: An AI engine for causal inference and argumentation".

    Read more about the KRINO project.

    Inspelen op emoties, daar win je tegenwoordig verkiezingen mee

    30 maart 2017

    Gijs van der Sanden: "Maar als het feitelijk allemaal niet klopt, dan is dat toch pure manipulatie?"
    Jean Wagemans:  “Dat zou kunnen, maar de verantwoordelijkheid voor het overtuigingsproces ligt ook bij de ontvanger van de boodschap. Zoals de oude Grieken al zeiden: Wie de retorica niet bestudeert, wordt er zelf het slachtoffer van.”

    Lees hier het Interview met Jean Wagemans.

    Recognizing arguments in the wild

    September 10, 2018

    The website on the Periodic Table of Arguments has been updated. Apart from new example analyses, it now also contains a step-by-step procedure that helps the analyst to recognize specific types of arguments in the wild.

    New website on the Periodic Table of Arguments 

    December 9, 2017

    You are invited to visit the new website about the Periodic Table of Arguments. It contains a description of the theoretical framework of the table, information on the types of arguments within the four different quadrants, and analyses of concrete examples. Please follow the link below.

    Visit the new website on the Periodic Table of Arguments

    Keynote at PhiLang 2017

    May 12, 2017

    Wagemans presented the Periodic Table of Arguments in a plenary lecture at the PhiLang 2017 conference in Łódz, addressing an audience of philosophers of language, linguists, and argumentation theorists. After a general explanation of the state-of-the-art in argument classification, he expounded the theoretical framework of the Periodic Table of Arguments, focusing on the characteristics of arguments based on the concept of analogy (and adjacent concepts such as comparison, metaphor, parallel, proportion, similarity, and resemblance).

    From fact-checking to rhetoric-checking

    March 16, 2017

    Dutch philosopher Jean Wagemans pleaded for what he coined ’rhetoric-checking’ in a lecture for the interdisciplinary student society Kairos. According to Wagemans, fact-checking is very useful, but it only produces information about the truth of statements and not about their relevance. Moreover, fact-checking does not apply to propositions of value nor to propositions of policy, both of which play an important role in politics and the public debate. After having explained a method for rhetoric-checking, Wagemans performed a rhetoric-check of statements taken from campaign ads and speech fragments of Joe the Plumber and Donald Trump.

    Rhetoric and public debate

    October 20, 2016

    Wagemans contributed to a documentary on the Dutch Ukraine–European Union Association Agreement referendum by giving his expert opinion on the role of rhetoric in the public debate preceding the referendum. The documentary was made by Misja Pekel and Judith Konijn and was broadcasted on Dutch national television.  

    Watch the documentary (in Dutch)

    Read the article (in Dutch)

    Rhetorical strategies of talk show debaters

    August 22, 2016

    On the occasion of the start of the talk show season on Dutch national television Wagemans was invited to analyze rhetorical manoeuvres in an exemplary talk show debate broadcasted during the previous season. The infamous debate was about the question whether soccer clubs should take measurements to prevent young players of Moroccan origine from joining the club. Wagemans' comments were incorporated in an article written by Haro Kraak that was published in the Dutch newspaper De Volkskrant.

    Read the newspaper article (in Dutch).

    Wagemans presents Periodic Table of Arguments in Croatia

    April 27, 2016

    Dutch philosopher Jean H.M. Wagemans of the University of Amsterdam presented his Periodic Table of Arguments on a conference on argumentation and rhetoric in Postira (Croatia) that was held last week. The table is an attempt to integrate philosophical (dialectical) and rhetorical accounts of the types of argument into a new standard model of argument.

    Wagemans chose the Days of Ivo Škarić International Conference on Rhetoric to be the first occasion to present his Periodic Table of Arguments. “It is one of the most important and enjoyable conferences in the field. Because of the relatively small size and the great hospitality of the organizers, there is ample opportunity to discuss your findings at length with a group of top scholars”.

    According to Wagemans, who has been working on the project for almost two years, the age-old antagonism between philosophy and rhetoric is reflected in the present-day field of argumentation theory: “Scholars working from a dialectical perspective tend to adhere to a strict division between reasonable arguments and fallacies. But since fallacies may be very effective, rhetoricians do not hesitate to include them in their accounts of the means of persuasion. As a result, there is a great divide between dialectical and rhetorical accounts of the types of arguments.”

    Apart from narrowing the gap between philosophy and rhetoric, creating a Periodic Table of Arguments addresses another vexing problem in the field of argumentation theory. “Some scholars say that there are 63 types of arguments, others say 300, and yet others stick to only 3 different types. Now one may state that this is unproblematic since in the humanities, contrary to the situation in the sciences, it is always a positive thing to have such a wide variety of opinions. But I don’t buy that.” According to Wagemans, who studied physics and astronomy before switching to philosophy, any account of the types of argument should be based on clear and explicit theoretical starting points. “Only in this case, our elaborate analyses and evaluations of argumentative discourse can be compared to one another.”

    The construction of the Periodic Table of Arguments has already generated several interesting hypotheses concerning the nature of arguments. “It appears to be the case that fallacies and several rhetorical means of persuasion can be reconstructed as second-order arguments. The periodicity of the table makes it easier to detect all kinds of differences and commonalities between the types of argument. I expect the table to generate a lot of interesting new research, not only theoretical but also empirical and computational research.”

    As was pointed out by one of the attendants of the conference, the Periodic Table of Arguments may also be used for educational purposes. At the moment, Wagemans is working on a book on the table and its applications. “It sure is a lot of work, but I really enjoy writing it. The Periodic Table of Elements wasn’t created in one day either. So if you have any comments or questions, please drop me a line!”

  • Publicaties

    2020

    • Gobbo, F., & Wagemans, J. H. M. (Accepted/In press). Representing second-order arguments with Adpositional Argumentation (AdArg). In Proceedings of ECA 2019, Groeningen.
    • Visser, J., Lawrence, J., Reed, C., Wagemans, J. H. M., & Walton, D. (2020). Annotating Argument Schemes. Argumentation, [373]. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10503-020-09519-x

    2019

    • Finsen, A. B., Steen, G. J., & Wagemans, J. H. M. (2019). An argumentative reconstruction of the computer metaphor of the brain. Journal of Argumentation in Context, 8(3), 317-335. https://doi.org/10.1075/jaic.18019.fin
    • Gobbo, F., & Wagemans, J. H. M. (2019). A method for reconstructing first-order arguments in natural language. CEUR Workshop Proceedings, 2296, 27-41. [details]
    • Gobbo, F., & Wagemans, J. H. M. (2019). Adpositional Argumentation (AdArg): A new method for representing linguistic and pragmatic information about argumentative discourse. In S. Doutre, & T. de Lima (Eds.), JIAF: Journées d’Intelligence Artificielle Fondamentale : PFIA 2019 (pp. 101-107). Association française pour l'Intelligence Artificielle.
    • Gobbo, F., & Wagemans, J. H. M. (2019). Building argumentative adpositional trees: Towards a high-precision method for reconstructing arguments in natural language. In B. Garssen, D. Godden, G. R. Mitchell, & J. H. M. Wagemans (Eds.), Proceedings of the Ninth Conference of the International Society for the Study of Argumentation (pp. 408-420). Amsterdam: Sic Sat. [details]
    • Gobbo, F., Benini, M., & Wagemans, J. H. M. (2019). Annotation with adpositional argumentation: Guidelines for building a Gold Standard Corpus of argumentative discourse. Intelligenza Artificiale, 13(2), 155-172. https://doi.org/10.3233/IA-190028
    • Snoeck Henkemans, A. F., & Wagemans, J. H. M. (2019). A pragma-dialectical reconstruction of medical Shared Decision-Making (SDM). In B. Garssen, D. Godden, G. R. Mitchell, & J. H. M. Wagemans (Eds.), Proceedings of the Ninth Conference of the International Society for the Study of Argumentation (pp. 1074-1082). Amsterdam: Sic Sat. [details]
    • Snoeck Henkemans, A. F., & Wagemans, J. H. M. (2019). Een pragma-dialectische reconstructie van de discussiebijdragen van arts en patiënt in ‘shared decision-making’. Tijdschrift voor Taalbeheersing, 41(1), 273–285. https://doi.org/10.5117/TVT2019.1.019.SNOE [details]
    • Visser, J. C., Lawrence, J., Wagemans, J. H. M., & Reed, C. (2019). An annotated corpus of argument schemes in US election debates. In B. J. Garssen, D. Godden, G. R. Mitchell, & J. H. M. Wagemans (Eds.), Proceedings of the Ninth Conference of the International Society for the Study of Argumentation (pp. 1101-1111). OSSA.
    • Wagemans, J. H. M. (2019). Four basic argument forms. Research in Language, 17(1), 57-69. https://doi.org/10.2478/rela-2019-0005 [details]

    2018

    • Visser, J., Lawrence, J., Wagemans, J., & Reed, C. (2018). Revisiting computational models of argument schemes: Classification, annotation, comparison. In S. Modgil, K. Budzynska, & J. Lawrence (Eds.), Computational Models of Argument: Proceedings of COMMA 2018 (pp. 313-324). (Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence and Applications; Vol. 305). Amsterdam: IOS Press. https://doi.org/10.3233/978-1-61499-906-5-313 [details]
    • Wagemans, J. H. M. (2018). Analogy, similarity, and the Periodic Table of Arguments. Studies in Logic, Grammar and Rhetoric, 55(1), 63-75. https://doi.org/10.2478/slgr-2018-0028 [details]
    • Wagemans, J. H. M. (2018). Argumentation Based on Conduction: Commentary on Blair's In Defence of Conduction: Two Neglected Features of Argumentation . In S. Oswald, & D. Maillat (Eds.), Argumentation and Inference: Proceedings of the 2nd European Conference on Argumentation (Vol. 1, pp. 45-50). (Studies in logic; Vol. 76). London: College Publications. [details]
    • Wagemans, J. H. M. (2018). Assertoric syllogistic and the Periodic Table of Arguments. In S. Oswald, & D. Maillat (Eds.), Argumentation and Inference: Proceedings of the 2nd European Conference on Argumentation (Vol. I, pp. 573-588). (Studies in logic; Vol. 76). London: College Publications. [details]

    2017

    • Wagemans, J. H. M. (2017). Quels critères pour déterminer la "meilleure" explication scientifique? Tranel, 65, 79-88. [details]

    2016

    • Snoeck Henkemans, A. F., & Wagemans, J. H. M. (2016). Redelijkheid in context: de rol van institutionele conventies in de pragma-dialectische beoordeling van argumentatie. In D. Van De Mieroop, L. Buysse, R. Coesemans, & P. Gillaerts (Eds.), De macht van de taal: taalbeheersingsonderzoek in Nederland en Vlaanderen (pp. 245-256). Leuven/Den Haag: Acco. [details]
    • Wagemans, J. H. M. (2016). Analyzing metaphor in argumentative discourse. Rivista Italiana di Filosofia del Linguaggio, 10(2), 79-94. https://doi.org/10.4396/20161207 [details]
    • Wagemans, J. H. M. (2016). Argumentative Patterns for Justifying Scientific Explanations. Argumentation, 30(1), 97-108. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10503-015-9374-2 [details]
    • Wagemans, J. H. M. (2016). Constructing a Periodic Table of Arguments. In L. Benacquista, & P. Bondy (Eds.), Argumentation, Objectivity and Bias: Proceedings of the Ontario Society for the Study of Argumentation Conference, Vol. 11, University of Windsor, May 18-21, 2016 Windsor, ON: OSSA. [details]
    • Wagemans, J. H. M. (2016). Criteria for deciding what is the ’best’ scientific explanation. In D. Mohammed, & M. Lewiński (Eds.), Argumentation and Reasoned Action: proceedings of the 1st European Conference on Argumentation, Lisbon 2015 (Vol. 2, pp. 43-54). (Studies in Logic; Vol. 63). London: College Publications. [details]
    • Wagemans, J. H. M. (2016). Reply to commentary on Constructing a Periodic Table of Arguments. In L. Benacquista, & P. Bondy (Eds.), Argumentation, Objectivity and Bias: Proceedings of the Ontario Society for the Study of Argumentation Conference, Vol. 11, University of Windsor, May 18-21, 2016 Windsor, ON: OSSA. [details]
    • Wagemans, J. H. M. (2016). Rhetorical Status Theory as an Institutional Framework for Legal Discussions. In E. T. Feteris, H. Kloosterhuis, H. J. Plug, & C. E. Smith (Eds.), Legal argumentation and the rule of law (pp. 205-215). The Hague: Eleven International Publishing. [details]

    2015

    • Snoeck Henkemans, A. F., & Wagemans, J. H. M. (2015). Reasonableness in context: Taking into account institutional conventions in the pragma-dialectical evaluation of argumentative discourse. In F. H. van Eemeren, & B. Garssen (Eds.), Reflections on theoretical issues in argumentation theory (pp. 217-226). (Argumentation Library; No. 28). Cham: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-21103-9_16 [details]
    • Wagemans, J. H. M. (2015). Argumentation from expert opinion in the 2011 U.S. debt ceiling debate. In C. H. Palczewski (Ed.), Disturbing argument: selected works from the 18th NCA/AFA Alta Conference of Argumentation (pp. 49-56). Abingdon: Routledge. [details]
    • Wagemans, J. H. M. (2015). [Review of: J. Crosswhite (2013) Deep Rhetoric: Philosophy, Reason, Violence, Justice, Wisdom]. Argumentation, 29(4), 475-479. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10503-015-9357-3 [details]
    • van Eemeren, F., Garssen, B., & Wagemans, J. H. M. (2015). El método pragma-dialéctico de análisis y evaluación. In F. Leal Carretero (Ed.), Argumentación y pragma-dialéctica: estudios en honor a Frans van Eemeren (pp. 127-154). Guadalajara: Editorial Universitaria Universidad de Guadalajara.

    2014

    • Wagemans, J. H. M. (2014). Commentary on: Michael Hoppmann's "Preciseness is a virtue: What are critical questions?". In D. Mohammed, & M. Lewiński (Eds.), Virtues of argumentation: proceedings of the 10th International Conference of the Ontario Society for the Study of Argumentation (OSSA), 22-26 May 2013 Windsor, ON: OSSA. [details]
    • Wagemans, J. H. M. (2014). Een systematische catalogus van argumenten. Tijdschrift voor Taalbeheersing, 36(1), 11-30. https://doi.org/10.5117/TVT2014.1.WAGE [details]
    • Wagemans, J. H. M. (2014). The assessment of argumentation based on abduction. In D. Mohammed, & M. Lewiński (Eds.), Virtues of argumentation: proceedings of the 10th International Conference of the Ontario Society for the Study of Argumentation (OSSA), 22-26 May 2013 Windsor, ON: OSSA. [details]
    • van Eemeren, F. H., Garssen, B., Krabbe, E. C. W., Snoeck Henkemans, A. F., Verheij, B., & Wagemans, J. H. M. (2014). Handbook of argumentation theory. Dordrecht: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-90-481-9473-5 [details]

    2013

    • Snoeck Henkemans, A. F., & Wagemans, J. H. M. (2013). Institutionele waarborgen voor de aanvaardbaarheid van deskundigheidsargumentatie in medische discussies. In R. Boogaart, & H. Jansen (Eds.), Studies in taalbeheersing 4 (pp. 315-325). Assen: Koninklijke Van Gorcum. [details]

    2012

    • Snoeck Henkemans, A. F., & Wagemans, J. H. M. (2012). The reasonableness of argumentation from expert opinion in medical discussions: Institutional safeguards for the quality of shared decision making. In J. Goodwin (Ed.), Between scientists & citizens: proceedings of a conference at Iowa State University, June 1-2, 2012 (pp. 345-354). Ames, IA: Great Plains Society for the Study of Argumentation. [details]
    • Wagemans, J. (2012). Commentaar bij Mireille Hildebrandt. In E. T. Feteris, H. Kloosterhuis, H. J. Plug, J. A. Pontier, & C. E. Smith (Eds.), Gewogen oordelen: essays over argumentatie en recht: bijdragen aan het Zesde Symposium Juridische Argumentatie 24 juni 2011 (pp. 357-360). Den Haag: Boom Juridische uitgevers. [details]

    2011

    • Hitchcock, D., & Wagemans, J. (2011). The pragma-dialectical account of argument schemes. In E. Feteris, B. Garssen, & F. Snoeck Henkemans (Eds.), Keeping in touch with pragma-dialectics: in honor of Frans H. van Eemeren (pp. 185-205). Amsterdam: Benjamins. [details]
    • Wagemans, J. H. M. (2011). Argument schemes, topoi, and laws of logic. In F. H. van Eemeren, B. Garssen, D. Godden, & G. Mitchell (Eds.), Proceedings of the 7th Conference of the International Society for the Study of Argumentation (pp. 1934-1939). Amsterdam: Rozenberg/Sic Sat. [details]
    • Wagemans, J. H. M. (2011). The assessment of argumentation from expert opinion. Argumentation, 25(3), 329-339. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10503-011-9225-8 [details]
    • van Eemeren, F. H., Garssen, B., & Wagemans, J. H. M. (2011). The pragma-dialectical method of analysis. In R. C. Rowland (Ed.), Reasoned argument and social change: selected papers from the 17th Biennial Conference on Argumentation (pp. 25-47). Washington, DC: National Communication Association. [details]

    2010

    2019

    • Garssen, B. J., Godden, D., Mitchell, G., & Wagemans, J. H. M. (Eds.) (2019). Proceedings of the Ninth Conference of the International Society for the Study of Argumentation. Amsterdam: Sic Sat.

    2018

    • Wagemans, J. H. M. (2018). Commentary on: “The potential of argumentation theory in enhancing patient-centered care in breaking bad news encounters”. Journal of Argumentation in Context, 7(2), 138-140. https://doi.org/10.1075/jaic.18033.wag [details]

    2015

    • Snoeck Henkemans, A. F., & Wagemans, J. H. M. (2015). Reasonableness in context: Taking into account institutional conventions in the pragma-dialectical evaluation of argumentative discourse. In B. J. Garssen, D. Godden, G. Mitchell, & A. F. Snoeck Henkemans (Eds.), International Society for the Study of Argumentation: 8th International Conference on Argumentation: July 1-July 4, 2014, University of Amsterdam, The Netherlands (pp. 1350-1359). Amsterdam: Sic Sat. [details]

    2014

    • Schut, D., & Wagemans, J. H. M. (2014). Argumentatie en debat. Den Haag: Boom Lemma uitgevers. [details]

    2011

    2007

    • van Eemeren, F. H., Snoeck Henkemans, A. F., Pilgram, R., & Wagemans, J. H. M. (2007). Werkboek argumentatie: Inleiding in het analyseren, beoordelen en houden van betogen. Heerlen: Open Universiteit Nederland. [details]

    Mediaoptreden

    • Wagemans, J., Gobbo, F. & Russo, F. (22-02-2020). AI ziet een drogreden [Print] De Volkskrant. AI ziet een drogreden.
    • Wagemans, J., Gobbo, F. & Russo, F. (21-02-2020). Deze filosofen maken een argumentatiemachine die, hopen zij, drogredenen uit toespraken kan vissen [Web]. Deze filosofen maken een argumentatiemachine die, hopen zij, drogredenen uit toespraken kan vissen.
    • Russo, F., Wagemans, J. & Gobbo, F. (21-11-2019). KRINO: An AI engine for causal inference and argumentation [Web]. KRINO: An AI engine for causal inference and argumentation.
    • Wagemans, J. (30-03-2017). Inspelen op emoties, daar win je tegenwoordig verkiezingen mee [Web] Iamstudent. Inspelen op emoties, daar win je tegenwoordig verkiezingen mee.
    • Wagemans, J. (20-10-2016). Het Oekraïne-referendum [Television] Argos TV – Medialogica. VPRO HUMAN. Het Oekraïne-referendum.
    • Wagemans, J. (22-08-2016). Ontregelen maar / Waarom stelt een talkshowdebat vaak teleur? [Print] De Volkskrant. Ontregelen maar / Waarom stelt een talkshowdebat vaak teleur?.
    • Wagemans, J. (11-03-2012). Profiel: Mark Rutte [Television] HUMAN. Profiel: Mark Rutte.
    • Wagemans, J. (17-12-2011). Wat een spreker is die man! [Print] NRC Handelsblad. Wat een spreker is die man!.
    • Wagemans, J. (01-10-2011). Niet van zijn stuk te krijgen [Print] Vrij Nederland. Niet van zijn stuk te krijgen.

    Spreker

    • Wagemans, J. (keynote speaker) (6-2-2020). Identifying pragmatic arguments, Pragmatic argumentation in the history of philosophy, Rome, Italy.
    • Wagemans, J. (invited speaker) (25-10-2019). Dialectical evaluation of individual arguments, Politicizing and depoliticizing climate change: How to evaluate public communication from argumentative perspectives?, Poznan, Poland.
    • Pereira Farina, M. (invited speaker), Wagemans, J. (invited speaker) & Gonzalez-Perez, C. (invited speaker) (10-10-2019). Unpacking public debates in participatory heritage, Arguments in the wild .
    • Wagemans, J. (speaker) & Plug, J. (speaker) (13-9-2019). From fact-checking to rhetoric-checking, Rhetoric in Society 7, Ghent, Belgium.
    • Wagemans, J. (keynote speaker) (28-8-2019). Hermeneutic aspects of identifying argument types, Hermeneutics as a form of epistemology.
    • Wagemans, J. (keynote speaker) (26-8-2019). The philosophy of argument, Hermeneutics as a form of epistemology.
    • Wagemans, J. (speaker) & Gobbo, F. (speaker) (2-7-2019). Adpositional Argumentation (AdArg), 13èmes Journées d'Intelligence Artificielle Fondamentale , Toulouse, France.
    • Wagemans, J. (speaker) (27-6-2019). Cross-modal mappings in multimodal argument schemes, 3rd European Conference on Argumentation.
    • Wagemans, J. (invited speaker) (27-6-2019). Plato's idea of true rhetoric, 3rd European Conference on Argumentation.
    • Wagemans, J. (speaker) (25-6-2019). Commentary on Lumer’s “Arguments from expert opinion”, 3rd European Conference on Argumentation.
    • Wagemans, J. (speaker) & Gobbo, F. (speaker) (25-6-2019). Representing second-order arguments, 3rd European Conference on Argumentation.
    • Wagemans, J. (speaker) (11-5-2019). A theoretical rationale for distinguishing between four basic argument forms, Sixth International Conference on Philosophy of Language and Linguistics, Lodz, Poland.
    • Wagemans, J. (invited speaker) (7-5-2019). Analyzing metaphor in argumentative discourse, University of Cagliari.
    • Wagemans, J. (invited speaker) (2-5-2019). Combining metaphor theory and argumentation theory, University of Cagliari.
    • Gobbo, F. (speaker) & Wagemans, J. (speaker) (20-11-2018). A method for reconstructing first-order arguments in natural language, AI3 2018 - 2nd Workshop on Advances in Argumentation in Artificial Intelligence, Trento, Italy.
    • Visser, J. C. (speaker) & Wagemans, J. (speaker) (16-9-2018). Annotating argument schemes with the Periodic Table of Arguments, ArgDiaP 2018, Warsaw, Poland.
    • Visser, J. C. (speaker), Lawrence, J. (speaker), Wagemans, J. (speaker) & Reed, C. (speaker) (14-9-2018). Revisiting computational models of argument schemes: Classification, annotation, comparison, COMMA 2018, Warsaw, Poland.
    • Visser, J. C. (speaker), Lawrence, J. (speaker), Wagemans, J. (speaker) & Reed, C. (speaker) (5-7-2018). An annotated corpus of argument schemes in US election debates, 9th ISSA Conference , Amsterdam, Netherlands.
    • Gobbo, F. (speaker) & Wagemans, J. (speaker) (3-7-2018). Representing first-order arguments in argumentative adtrees, 9th ISSA Conference , Amsterdam, Netherlands.
    • Snoeck Henkemans, A. F. (speaker) & Wagemans, J. (speaker) (3-7-2018). A pragma-dialectical reconstruction of medical shared decision-making (SDM), 9th ISSA Conference , Amsterdam, Netherlands.
    • Wagemans, J. (invited speaker) (2-6-2018). Rhetoric in the Netherlands: Approaches and applications, RSA 2018 Conference, Minneapolis, United States.
    • Wagemans, J. (invited speaker) (31-5-2018). The exemplification of Plato’s true rhetoric in the Meno, RSA 2018 Conference, Minneapolis, United States.
    • Wagemans, J. (invited speaker) (11-5-2018). Linguistic features of argumentative mechanisms, WILL TWO workshop, Łódź, Poland.
    • Wagemans, J. (speaker) (18-4-2018). Pathetic means of persuasion as second-order arguments, Days of Ivo Škarić 4th International Conference on Rhetoric, Postira, Croatia.
    • Wagemans, J. (speaker) (7-2-2018). Propositions of policy and types of argument, ARGAGE 2018 Conference, Lugano, Switzerland.
    • Wagemans, J. (invited speaker) (1-2-2018). Pragmatic aspects of Aristotle’s dialectic, Topica Project Workshop, Gothenburg, Sweden.
    • Wagemans, J. (speaker) (19-1-2018). De argumentatieve taakverdeling tussen arts en patient in shared decision-making, VIOT 2018: Duurzame Taalbeheersing, Groningen, Netherlands.
    • Wagemans, J. (invited speaker) (9-1-2018). How to reconstruct an argument from authority?, Workshop in honour of Barbara Partee, Amsterdam.
    • Wagemans, J. (speaker) (16-11-2017). Informal sisters of Dame Logica: On the dialectical and rhetorical accounts of argument, LIRa seminar, ILLC, University of Amsterdam.
    • Wagemans, J. (speaker) (26-10-2017). Commentary on Karnieli-Miller & Neufeld Kroszynski’s The potential of argumentation theory in enhancing patient centered care in breaking bad news encounters, Symposium on medical argumentation and patient centered care.
    • Wagemans, J. (speaker) (14-9-2017). A factorial approach to argument classification, University of Dundee.
    • Wagemans, J. (speaker) (5-7-2017). Ethotic means of persuasion as second-order arguments, RSE 2017 Conference.
    • Wagemans, J. (speaker) (22-6-2017). The accommodation of syllogistic inferences in the Periodic Table of Arguments, 2nd European Conference on Argumentation: Argumentation and inference.
    • Wagemans, J. (speaker) (21-6-2017). Commentary on Blair’s In defence of conductive argument: Two neglected features of argumentation, 2nd European Conference on Argumentation: Argumentation and inference.
    • Wagemans, J. (speaker) (19-6-2017). A procedure for rhetoric-checking, Facts in Argumentation.
    • Wagemans, J. (speaker) (26-5-2017). Are metaphorical arguments always based on the concept of analogy?, Metaphor and Argumentation.
    • Wagemans, J. (keynote speaker) (12-5-2017). Analogy, similarity and the Periodic Table of Arguments, PhiLang 2017 Conference, Łódź, Poland.
    • Wagemans, J. (speaker) (31-3-2017). Conceptions of practical argumentation, Practical argumentation in the European energy and climate debates.
    • Wagemans, J. (speaker) (4-11-2016). The PETARG project: Presentation and response to criticisms, Research Colloquium TAR, University of Amsterdam.
    • Wagemans, J. (speaker) (24-10-2016). Using the Periodic Table of Arguments for analysing academic argumentation, Research colloquium Department of Philosophy and History of Science.
    • Wagemans, J. (speaker) (24-6-2016). Towards a Periodic Table of Arguments, Research Colloquium TAR, University of Amsterdam.
    • Wagemans, J. (speaker) (21-5-2016). Constructing a Periodic Table of Arguments, OSSA 11 - Argumentation, Objectivity, and Bias. University of Windsor, Canada.
    • Wagemans, J. (speaker) (26-4-2016). Presumptions and argumentation schemes in policy debate (with J.A. van Laar), Presumptions, presumptive inferences, and burden of proof. University of Granada, Spain.
    • Wagemans, J. (speaker) (21-4-2016). Integrating dialectical and rhetorical taxonomies of argument types, Days of Ivo Škarić 3rd International Conference on Rhetoric. Postira, Croatia.
    • Wagemans, J. H. M. (speaker) (4-1-2016). Retorische aspecten van wetenschappelijke artikelen, Guest Lecture, University of Amsterdam.
    • Wagemans, J. H. M. (speaker) (23-10-2015). Identifying argumentative patterns in academic communication, 1st Sino-Dutch Conference on Pragma-Dialectics, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou.
    • Wagemans, J. H. M. (speaker) (25-9-2015). Argumentative relations between debate propositions, Workshop Practical argumentation in the energy and climate debates: Values, argumentative strategies, and discursive representations, New University of Lisbon.
    • Wagemans, J. H. M. (speaker) (29-6-2015). Argumentation in policy debates, University of Groningen Summer School, Brussels.
    • Wagemans, J. H. M. (speaker) (26-6-2015). Rhetorical status theory as an institutional framework for rational disagreement, Legal argumentation and the Rule of Law, Erasmus University Rotterdam.
    • Wagemans, J. H. M. (speaker) (18-6-2015). Assessing the acceptability of arguments in judicial debate, Giornate tridente de retorica: XV edizione, University of Trento.
    • Wagemans, J. H. M. (speaker) (10-6-2015). Criteria for deciding what is the 'best' scientific explanation, ECA Conference on Argumentation, New University of Lisbon.
    • Wagemans, J. H. M. (speaker) (22-5-2015). Comments on Garssen, ILIAS Symposium on Strategic Maneouvring in Argumentative Political Discourse, Leiden University.
    • Wagemans, J. H. M. (speaker) (12-3-2015). Argumentatie en debat, Boom Docentendag Communicatie, Utrecht.
    • Wagemans, J. H. M. (invited speaker) (16-1-2015). Een dialectische interpretatie van de klassiek-retorische statusleer, ISHR Benelux - Colloquium over de geschiedenis van de retorica, Radboud Universiteit Nijmegen.
    • Wagemans, J. H. M. (speaker) (6-1-2015). Retorische aspecten van wetenschappelijke artikelen, Guest Lecture, University of Amsterdam.
    • Wagemans, J. H. M. (speaker) & Snoeck Henkemans, A. F. (speaker) (17-12-2014). Redelijkheid in context: De rol van institutionele conventies in de pragma-dialectische evaluatie van argumentatie, VIOT 2014, KU Leuven.
    • Wagemans, J. H. M. (invited speaker) (21-11-2014). The status of international argumentation studies, NCA 100, Chicago.
    • Wagemans, J. H. M. (speaker) (1-10-2014). Classical rhetoric, Guest Lecture, University of Amsterdam.
    • Wagemans, J. H. M. (speaker) & Snoeck Henkemans, A. F. (speaker) (2-7-2014). Reasonableness in context: Taking into account institutional conventions in the pragma-dialectical evaluation of argumentative discourse, ISSA 8th International Conference on Argumentation, University of Amsterdam.
    • Wagemans, J. H. M. (speaker) (15-5-2014). Kant's wijze van argumenteren, Het intieme denken: Over reflectie en eindigheid. Symposium naar aanleiding van de 70e verjaardag van dr. Kees Jan Brons, Amsterdam.
    • Wagemans, J. H. M. (speaker) (23-4-2014). Beyond deductivism: About the relation between the classical theory of syllogism and that of topics (topoi, loci), 2nd International Conference Days of Ivo Škarić, Postira, Croatia.
    • Wagemans, J. H. M. (speaker) (4-11-2013). Argumentatie in Spinoza's Ethica, Guest Lecture, Tilburg University.
    • Wagemans, J. H. M. (speaker) (12-10-2013). Rhetorical qualities of argumentation based on abduction, Rhetoric in Europe, Saarland University, Saarbruecken.
    • Wagemans, J. H. M. (speaker) (19-9-2013). The system of classical rhetoric, Guest Lecture, University of Amsterdam.
    • Wagemans, J. H. M. (invited speaker) (1-8-2013). Argumentation from expert opinion in the 2011 U.S. debt ceiling debate, NCA/AFA Conference on Argumentation, Alta, UT.
    • Wagemans, J. H. M. (speaker) (26-5-2013). Comments on Michael Hoppmann, Preciseness is a virtue: What are critical questions?, OSSA 10 - Virtues of Argumentation, University of Windsor.
    • Wagemans, J. H. M. (speaker) (24-5-2013). The assessment of argumentation based on abduction, OSSA 10 - Virtues of Argumentation, University of Windsor.
    • Wagemans, J. H. M. (speaker) (18-1-2013). The pattern of abductive reasoning in academic discussions, TAR Research Colloquium, University of Amsterdam.
    • Wagemans, J. H. M. (invited speaker) (28-11-2012). Two approaches to abductive reasoning, Argupolis 2: Thematic school, University of Lugano.
    • Wagemans, J. H. M. (speaker) & Snoeck Henkemans, A. F. (speaker) (1-6-2012). Institutional safeguards for the quality of argumentation from expert opinion in medical consultations, Science Communication Project, Iowa State University.
    • Wagemans, J. H. M. (invited speaker) (20-2-2012). Argumentation from expert opinion, ArgLab Research Colloquium, Lisbon.
    • Wagemans, J. H. M. (speaker) & Snoeck Henkemans, A. F. (speaker) (21-12-2011). De redelijkheid van deskundigheidsargumentatie in medische discussies, VIOT Conferentie, Leiden University.
    • Wagemans, J. H. M. (speaker) (15-11-2011). Deskundigheidsargumentatie in het recht, Symposium Met recht retorica, Breda.
    • Wagemans, J. H. M. (speaker) (28-9-2011). The role of the expert in argumentative activity types, 2nd ASCA Summit, University of Amsterdam.
    • Wagemans, J. H. M. (invited speaker) (29-7-2011). Recent developments in pragma-dialectics, NCA/AFA Conference on Argumentation, Alta, UT.
    • Wagemans, J. H. M. (speaker) (24-6-2011). Argumenteren met behulp van juridische expertsystemen, Zesde Symposium Juridische Argumentatie, Rotterdam.
    • Wagemans, J. H. M. (invited speaker) (4-2-2011). Starting points of studying strategic maneuvering in academic communication, Research Colloquium TAR, University of Amsterdam.
    • Wagemans, J. H. M. (speaker) (15-1-2011). Characteristics of academic communication, XI Amsterdam-Lugano Colloquium on Argumentation Theory, Università della Svizzera italiana, Lugano.
    • Wagemans, J. H. M. (speaker) (30-9-2010). Argumentative Discourse in an Academic Context, 1st ASCA Summit, University of Amsterdam.
    • Wagemans, J. H. M. (speaker) (7-7-2010). Strategic maneuvering in academic activity types, Summer School on Argumentation in Context 2010, University of Amsterdam.
    • Wagemans, J. H. M. (speaker) (30-6-2010). Argument schemes, topoi, and laws of logic, ISSA 7th International Conference on Argumentation, University of Amsterdam.
    • Wagemans, J. H. M. (speaker) (27-11-2009). Scholarly argumentation, X Amsterdam-Lugano Colloquium on Argumentation Theory, Università della Svizzera italiana, Lugano.
    • Wagemans, J. H. M. (speaker) (5-11-2009). De antieke dialectica [Ancient dialectic], Guest lecture, Leiden University.
    • Wagemans, J. H. M. (speaker) (12-6-2009). Wat betekent ‘dialectica’? [What does ‘dialectic’ mean?], Guest Lecture, University of Amsterdam.
    • Wagemans, J. H. M. (speaker) (21-1-2009). The dialectical dimension of ‘status theory’, Rhetoric in Society Conference, Leiden University.
    • Wagemans, J. H. M. (speaker) (30-11-2007). Status Theory and Pragma-Dialectics, Lugano- Amsterdam Colloquium, Lugano, Università della Svizzera Italiana.
    • Wagemans, J. H. M. (speaker) (13-1-2007). Dialectic and Rhetoric: Historico-Philosophical Backgrounds of Pragma-Dialectics, Lugano- Amsterdam Colloquium on Argumentation, Università della Svizzera Italiana, Lugano.
    This list of publications is extracted from the UvA-Current Research Information System. Questions? Ask the library or the Pure staff of your faculty / institute. Log in to Pure to edit your publications. Log in to Personal Page Publication Selection tool to manage the visibility of your publications on this list.
  • Nevenwerkzaamheden
    • Geen nevenwerkzaamheden