Dr. Y. (Yaïr) Pinto
Faculty of Social and Behavioural Sciences
Programme group Brain and Cognition
Visiting address
- Nieuwe Achtergracht 129
- Room number: 0.07
Postal address
- Postbus 15915
1001 NK Amsterdam
Contact details
-
Publications
2022
Lammers, N. A., Van den Berg, N. S., Lugtmeijer, S., Smits, A. R., Pinto, Y., de Haan, E. H. F., & the visual brain group (2022). Mid-range visual deficits after stroke: Prevalence and co-occurrence. PLoS ONE, 17(4), [e0262886]. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0262886 [details]- van den Berg, N. S., Lammers, N. A., Smits, A. R., Lugtmeijer, S., Pinto, Y., & De Haan, E. H. F. (2022). Mid-range visual functions in relation to higher-order visual functions after stroke. Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology, 44(8), 580-591. https://doi.org/10.1080/13803395.2022.2147487 [details]
2021
- Lugtmeijer, S., Geerligs, L., de Leeuw, F. E., de Haan, E. H. F., Kessels, R. P. C., & The Visual Brain Group (2021). Are visual working memory and episodic memory distinct processes? Insight from stroke patients by lesion-symptom mapping. Brain Structure and Function, 226(6), 1713-1726. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00429-021-02281-0 [details]
- de Haan, E. H. F., Scholte, H. S., Pinto, Y., Foschi, N., Polonara, G., & Fabri, M. (2021). Singularity and consciousness: A neuropsychological contribution. Journal of Neuropsychology, 15(1), 1-19. https://doi.org/10.1111/jnp.12234 [details]
- van den Berg, N. S., de Haan, E. H. F., Huitema, R. B., Spikman, J. M., & the visual brain group (2021). The neural underpinnings of facial emotion recognition in ischemic stroke patients. Journal of Neuropsychology, 15(3), 516-532. https://doi.org/10.1111/jnp.12240 [details]
2020
- Pinto, Y., de Haan, E. H. F., Villa, M-C., Soliquini, S., Polonara, G., Passamonti, C., Lattanzi, S., Foschi, N., & Fabri, M. (2020). Unified Visual Working Memory without the Anterior Corpus Callosum. Symmetry, 12(12), [2106]. https://doi.org/10.3390/sym12122106 [details]
- de Haan, E. H. F., Corballis, P. M., Hillyard, S. A., Marzi, C. A., Seth, A., Lamme, V. A. F., Volz, L., Fabri, M., Schechter, E., Bayne, T., Corballis, M., & Pinto, Y. (2020). Split-Brain: What We Know Now and Why This is Important for Understanding Consciousness. Neuropsychology Review, 30(2), 224-233. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11065-020-09439-3 [details]
- de Haan, E. H. F., Fabri, M., Dijkerman, H. C., Foschi, N., Lattanzi, S., & Pinto, Y. (2020). Unified tactile detection and localisation in split-brain patients. Cortex, 124, 217-223. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cortex.2019.11.010 [details]
2018
- Beek, T. F., Matzke, D., Pinto, Y., Rotteveel, M., Gierholz, A., Verhagen, J., Selker, R., Sasiadek, A., Steingroever, H., Jostmann, N. B., & Wagenmakers, E-J. (2018). Incidental Haptic Sensations May Not Influence Social Judgments: A Purely Confirmatory Replication Attempt of Study 1 by Ackerman, Nocera, and Bargh (2010). Journal of Articles in Support of the Null Hypothesis, 14(2), 69-90. https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=aph&AN=132351143&site=ehost-live&scope=site [details]
2017
- Lammers, N. A., de Haan, E. H., & Pinto, Y. (2017). No Evidence of Narrowly Defined Cognitive Penetrability in Unambiguous Vision. Frontiers in Psychology, 8, [852]. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2017.00852 [details]
- Otten, M., Pinto, Y., Paffen, C. L. E., Seth, A. K., & Kanai, R. (2017). The uniformity illusion: Central stimuli can determine peripheral perception. Psychological Science, 28(1), 56-68. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797616672270 [details]
- Otten, M., Seth, A. K., & Pinto, Y. (2017). A social bayesian brain: How social knowledge can shape visual perception. Brain and Cognition, 112, 69-77. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bandc.2016.05.002 [details]
- Pinto, Y., Neville, D. A., Otten, M., Corballis, P. M., Lamme, V. A. F., de Haan, E. H. F., Foschi, N., & Fabri, M. (2017). Split brain: Divided perception but undivided consciousness. Brain, 140(5), 1231–1237. https://doi.org/10.1093/brain/aww358 [details]
- Pinto, Y., Vandenbroucke, A. R., Otten, M., Sligte, I. G., Seth, A. K., & Lamme, V. A. F. (2017). Conscious visual memory with minimal attention. Journal of Experimental Psychology. General, 146(2), 214-226. https://doi.org/10.1037/xge0000255, https://doi.org/10.1037/xge0000255.supp [details]
- Pinto, Y., de Haan, E. H. F., & Lamme, V. A. F. (2017). The Split-Brain phenomenon revisited: A single conscious agent with split perception. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 21(11), 835-851. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2017.09.003 [details]
- Zerr, P., Gayet, S., Mulder, K., Pinto, Y., Sligte, I., & Van der Stigchel, S. (2017). Remapping high-capacity, pre-Attentive, fragile sensory memory. Scientific Reports, 7, [15940]. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-16156-0 [details]
2015
- Pinto, Y., van Gaal, S., de Lange, F. P., Lamme, V. A. F., & Seth, A. K. (2015). Expectations accelerate entry of visual stimuli into awareness. Journal of Vision, 15(8), [13]. https://doi.org/10.1167/15.8.13 [details]
- Rotteveel, M., Gierholz, A., Koch, G., van Aalst, C., Pinto, Y., Matzke, D., ... Wagenmakers, E-J. (2015). On the automatic link between affect and tendencies to approach and avoid: Chen and Bargh (1999) revisited. Frontiers in Psychology, 6, [335]. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2015.00335 [details]
- Wagenmakers, E-J., Beek, T. F., Rotteveel, M., Gierholz, A., Matzke, D., Steingroever, H., Ly, A., Verhagen, J., Selker, R., Sasiadek, A., Gronau, Q. F., Love, J., & Pinto, Y. (2015). Turning the hands of time again: a purely confirmatory replication study and a Bayesian analysis. Frontiers in Psychology, 6, [494]. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2015.00494 [details]
2013
- Pinto, Y., Sligte, I. G., Shapiro, K. L., & Lamme, V. A. F. (2013). Fragile visual short-term memory is an object-based and location-specific store. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 20(4), 732-739. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13423-013-0393-4 [details]
- Pinto, Y., van der Leij, A. R., Sligte, I. G., Lamme, V. A. F., & Scholte, H. S. (2013). Bottom-up and top-down attention are independent. Journal of Vision, 13(3), 16. [16]. https://doi.org/10.1167/13.3.16 [details]
2012
- Pinto, Y., Scholte, H. S., & Lamme, V. A. F. (2012). Tracking moving identities: after attending the right location, the identity does not come for free. PLoS ONE, 7(8), e42929. [e42929]. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0042929 [details]
2011
- Cohen, M. A., Pinto, Y., Howe, P. D. L., & Horowitz, T. S. (2011). The what-where trade-off in multiple-identity tracking. Attention, Perception & Psychophysics, 73(5), 1422-1434. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13414-011-0089-7 [details]
- Evans, K. K., Horowitz, T. S., Howe, P., Pedersini, R., Reijnen, E., Pinto, Y., & Wolfe, J. M. (2011). Visual attention. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews. Cognitive Science, 2(5), 503-514. https://doi.org/10.1002/wcs.127 [details]
- Howe, P. D. L., Drew, T., Pinto, Y., & Horowitz, T. S. (2011). Remapping attention in multiple object tracking. Vision Research, 51(5), 489-495. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.visres.2011.01.001 [details]
- Pinto, Y., Otten, M., Cohen, M. A., Wolfe, J. M., & Horowitz, T. S. (2011). The boundary conditions for Bohr’s law: when is reacting faster than acting? Attention, Perception & Psychophysics, 73(2), 613-620. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13414-010-0057-7 [details]
- Wolfe, J. M., Reijnen, E., Horowitz, T. S., Pedersini, R., Pinto, Y., & Hulleman, J. (2011). How does our search engine "see" the world? The case of amodal completion. Attention, Perception, and Psychophysics, 73(4), 1054-1064. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13414-011-0103-0
2010
- Howe, P. D. L., Cohen, M. S., Pinto, Y., & Horowitz, T. S. (2010). Distinguishing between parallel and serial accounts of multiple object tracking. Journal of Vision, 10(8), [11]. https://doi.org/10.1167/10.8.11 [details]
- Howe, P. D. L., Pinto, Y., & Horowitz, T. S. (2010). The coordinate systems used in visual tracking. Vision Research, 50, 2375-2380. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.visres.2010.09.026 [details]
- Pinto, Y., Howe, P. D. L., Cohen, M. A., & Horowitz, T. S. (2010). The more often you see an object, the easier it becomes to track it. Journal of Vision, 10(10), 4. https://doi.org/10.1167/10.10.4 [details]
2008
- Pinto, Y., Olivers, C. N. L., & Theeuwes, J. (2008). Selecting from dynamic environments: Attention distinguishes between blinking and moving. Perception and Psychophysics, 70(1), 166-178. https://doi.org/10.3758/PP.70.1.166
- Pinto, Y., Olivers, C. N. L., & Theeuwes, J. (2008). Static items are automatically prioritized in a dynamic environment. Visual Cognition, 16(7), 916-932. https://doi.org/10.1080/13506280701575375
2007
- Pinto, Y., Olivers, C. N. L., & Theeuwes, J. (2007). The detection of temporally defined objects does not require focused attention. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 61(8), 1134-1142. https://doi.org/10.1080/17470210701851198
2006
- Pinto, Y., Olivers, C. N. L., & Theeuwes, J. (2006). When is search for a static target among dynamic distractors efficient? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 32(1), 59-72. https://doi.org/10.1037/0096-1523.32.1.59
2005
- Pinto, Y., Olivers, C. N. L., & Theeuwes, J. (2005). Target uncertainty does not lead to more distraction by singletons: Intertrial priming does. Perception and Psychophysics, 67(8), 1354-1361. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03193640
2021
- Pinto, Y., & Stein, T. (2021). The hard problem makes the easy problems hard – a reply to Doerig et al. Cognitive Neuroscience, 12(2), 97-98. https://doi.org/10.1080/17588928.2020.1838469 [details]
2020
- Pool, M. O., De Vos, B. D., Wolterink, J. M., Blok, S., Schuuring, M. J., Bleijendaal, H., Dohmen, D. A. J., Tulevski, I. I., Somsen, G. A., Mulder, B. J. M., Pinto, Y., Bouma, B. J., Isgum, I., & Winter, M. M. (2020). Distinguishing sinus rhythm from atrial fibrillation on single-lead ECGs using a deep neural network. European Heart journal, 41(Supplement 2), 3442. https://doi.org/10.1093/ehjci/ehaa946.3442
2017
- Pinto, Y., Lamme, V. A. F., & de Haan, E. H. F. (2017). Cross-cueing cannot explain unified control in split-brain patients. Brain, 140(11), [e68]. https://doi.org/10.1093/brain/awx235 [details]
2011
- Cohen, M. A., Pinto, Y., Howe, P. D. L., & Horowitz, T. S. (2011). Erratum to: The what-where trade-off in multiple-identity tracking (Atten Percept Psychophys, 10.3758/s13414-011-0089-7). Attention, Perception, and Psychophysics, 73(8), 2668. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13414-011-0195-6
2020
- de Haan, E. H. F., & Pinto, Y. (2020). Callosal Syndromes. In J. Stein (Ed.), Reference Module in Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Psychology Elsevier. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-819641-0.00051-7 [details]
2019
- Pakholiuk, O., Bos, L. S., & Pinto, Y. (2019). Parafoveal preview benefit in mildly aphasic readers.
2017
- Pinto, Y., de Haan, E. H. F., & Lamme, V. A. F. (2017). Split-Brain, unified consciousness. Poster session presented at Annual meeting of the Association for the Scientific Study of Consciousness, Beijing, China.
Talk / presentation
- Pinto, Y. (speaker) (8-6-2017). The requirements for conscious unity, Technical University of Kaiserslautern.
- Pinto, Y. (speaker) (3-2-2017). Split-Brain, unified consciousness, Tokyo consciousness association.
This list of publications is extracted from the UvA-Current Research Information System. Questions? Ask the library or the Pure staff of your faculty / institute. Log in to Pure to edit your publications. Log in to Personal Page Publication Selection tool to manage the visibility of your publications on this list. -
Ancillary activities
- No ancillary activities
Lammers, N. A., Van den Berg, N. S., Lugtmeijer, S., Smits, A. R., Pinto, Y., de Haan, E. H. F., & the visual brain group (2022). Mid-range visual deficits after stroke: Prevalence and co-occurrence. PLoS ONE, 17(4), [e0262886].