For best experience please turn on javascript and use a modern browser!
You are using a browser that is no longer supported by Microsoft. Please upgrade your browser. The site may not present itself correctly if you continue browsing.
van Gemert, B., Cokart, R., Esselink, L., de Meulder, M., Sijm, N., & Roelofsen, F. (2022). First Steps Towards a Signing Avatar for Railway Travel Announcements in the Netherlands. In E. Efthimiou, S-E. Fotinea, T. Hanke, J. C. McDonald, D. Shterionov, & R. Wolfe (Eds.), Proceedings : 7th Workshop on Sign Language Translation and Avatar Technology: The Junction of the Visual and the Textual: Challenges and Perspectives (SLTAT 7): LREC 2022 Workshop : Language Resources and Evaluation Conference, 24 June 2022 (pp. 109-116). European Language Resources Association. https://aclanthology.org/2022.sltat-1.17[details]
Roelofsen, F., Esselink, L. D., Mende Gillings, S. E., de Meulder, M., Sijm, N., & Smeijers, A. (2021). Online evaluation of text-to-sign translation by deaf end users: Some methodological recommendations. In D. Shterionov (Ed.), First International Workshop on Automatic Translation for Sign and Spoken Languages (pp. 82-87). Association for Machine Translation in the Americas. https://aclanthology.org/2021.mtsummit-at4ssl.9/
Roelofsen, F., Esselink, L., Mende-Gillings, S., & Smeijers, A. (2021). Sign Language Translation in a Healthcare Setting. In R. Mitkov, V. Sosoni, J. C. Giguère, E. Murgolo, & E. Deysel (Eds.), TRITON 2021 : TRanslation and Interpreting Technology ONline: proceedings of the conference : 05-07 July, 2021 (pp. 110–124). INCOMA Ltd.. https://doi.org/10.26615/978-954-452-071-7_013[details]
Dotlačil, J., & Roelofsen, F. (2020). A dynamic semantics of single-wh and multiple-wh questions. Proceedings from Semantics and Linguistic Theory, 30, 376-395. https://doi.org/10.3765/salt.v30i0.4839[details]
Roelofsen, F., & Uegaki, W. (2020). Searching for a universal constraint on the possible denotations of clause-embedding predicates. Proceedings from Semantics and Linguistic Theory, 30, 542-561. https://doi.org/10.3765/salt.v30i0.4834[details]
Cremers, A., Roelofsen, F., & Uegaki, W. (2019). Distributive ignorance inferences with wonder and believe. Semantics and Pragmatics, 12, [5]. https://doi.org/10.3765/sp.12.5[details]
Dotlačil, J., & Roelofsen, F. (2019). Dynamic inquisitive semantics: anaphora and questions. In M. T. Espinal, E. Castroviejo, M. Leonetti, L. McNally, & C. Real-Puigdollers (Eds.), Proceedings of Sinn und Bedeutung 23 (Vol. 1, pp. 365-382). Barcelona: Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona. https://doi.org/10.18148/sub/2019.v23i1.538[details]
Roelofsen, F. (2019). Surprise for Lauri Karttunen. In T. Holloway King, & C. Condoravdi (Eds.), Tokens of Meaning: Papers in Honor of Lauri Karttunen CSLI Publications. https://semanticsarchive.net/Archive/mI4NTFjO/paper.pdf
Roelofsen, F. (2019). Two alternatives for disjunction: An inquisitive reconciliation. In M. Zimmermann, K. von Heusinger, & E. Onea (Eds.), Questions in Discourse. - Volume 2: Pragmatics (pp. 251–274). (Current Research in the Semantics/Pragmatics Interface; Vol. 36). Brill. https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004378322_009[details]
Roelofsen, F., Herbstritt, M., & Aloni, M. (2019). The *whether puzzle. In K. von Heusinger, M. Zimmermann, & E. Onea (Eds.), Questions in Discourse. - Volume 1: Semantics (pp. 172-197). (Current Research in the Semantics/Pragmatics Interface; Vol. 35). Brill. https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004378308_005[details]
Theiler, N., Roelofsen, F., & Aloni, M. (2019). Picky predicates: why believe doesn't like interrogative complements, and other puzzles. Natural Language Semantics, 27(2), 95-134. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11050-019-09152-9[details]
Aloni, M. (Guest ed.), Berto, F. (Guest ed.), Incurvati, L. (Guest ed.), & Roelofsen, F. (Guest ed.) (2018). Semantics and Philosophy. Topoi, 37(3), 355-433. https://link.springer.com/journal/11245/37/3
Ciardelli, I., Coppock, E., & Roelofsen, F. (2018). Implicatures of modified numerals: quality or quantity? In R. Truswell, C. Cummins, C. Heycock, B. Rabern, & H. Rohde (Eds.), Proceedings of Sinn und Bedeutung 21: University of Edinburgh : 4-6 September 2016 (Vol. 1, pp. 283-300). semanticsarchive.net. [details]
Roelofsen, F., & Uegaki, W. (2018). The distributive ignorance puzzle. In R. Truswell, C. Cummins, C. Heycock, B. Rabern, & H. Rohde (Eds.), Proceedings of Sinn und Bedeutung 21: University of Edinburgh : 4-6 September 2016 (Vol. 2, pp. 999-1016). semanticsarchive.net. [details]
Theiler, N., Roelofsen, F., & Aloni, M. (2018). A uniform semantics for declarative and interrogative complements. Journal of Semantics, 35(3), 409-466. https://doi.org/10.1093/jos/ffy003[details]
Uegaki, W., & Roelofsen, F. (2018). Do modals take propositions or sets of propositions? Evidence from Japanese darou. Proceedings from Semantics and Linguistic Theory, 28, 809-829. https://doi.org/10.3765/salt.v28i0.4427[details]
van Gessel, T., Cremers, A., & Roelofsen, F. (2018). Polarity sensitivity of question embedding: experimental evidence. Proceedings from Semantics and Linguistic Theory, 28, 217-232. https://doi.org/10.3765/salt.v28i0.4424[details]
Ciardelli, I., & Roelofsen, F. (2017). Hurford's constraint, the semantics of disjunction, and the nature of alternatives. Natural Language Semantics, 25(3), 199-222. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11050-017-9134-y[details]
Farkas, D. F., & Roelofsen, F. (2017). Division of labor in the interpretation of declaratives and interrogatives. Journal of Semantics, 34(2), 237-289. https://doi.org/10.1093/jos/ffw012[details]
Theiler, N., Roelofsen, F., & Aloni, M. (2017). What's wrong with believing whether? Proceedings from Semantics and Linguistic Theory, 27, 248-265. https://doi.org/10.3765/salt.v27i0.4125[details]
Theiler, N., Roelofsen, F., & Aloni, M. (2016). Truthful resolutions: A new perspective on false-answer sensitivity. Proceedings from Semantics and Linguistic Theory, 26, 122-141. https://doi.org/10.3765/salt.v26i0.3791[details]
Ciardelli, I., & Roelofsen, F. (2015). Alternatives in Montague grammar. In E. Csipak, & H. Zeijlstra (Eds.), Proceedings of Sinn und Bedeutung 19 (pp. 161-178). Göttingen: Georg-August-University. [details]
Roelofsen, F., & Farkas, D. F. (2015). Polarity particle responses as a window onto the interpretation of questions and assertions. Language, 91(2), 359-414. https://doi.org/10.1353/lan.2015.0017[details]
Ciardelli, I., Groenendijk, J., & Roelofsen, F. (2014). Information, issues, and attention. In D. Gutzmann, J. Köpping, & C. Meier (Eds.), Approaches to Meaning: Composition, Values, and Interpretation (pp. 128-166). (Current Research in the Semantics/Pragmatics Interface; Vol. 32). Leiden: Brill. https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004279377_007[details]
Brasoveanu, A., Farkas, D., & Roelofsen, F. (2013). N-words and sentential negation: evidence from polarity particles and VP-ellipsis. Semantics and Pragmatics, 6, [7]. https://doi.org/10.3765/sp.6.7[details]
Ciardelli, I., Groenendijk, J., & Roelofsen, F. (2013). Inquisitive semantics: a new notion of meaning. Language and Linguistics Compass, 7(9), 459-476. https://doi.org/10.1111/lnc3.12037[details]
Ciardelli, I., Groenendijk, J., & Roelofsen, F. (2013). Towards a logic of information exchange: an inquisitive witness semantics. In G. Bezhanishvili, S. Löbner, V. Marra, & F. Richter (Eds.), Logic, Language and Computation: 9th International Tbilisi Symposium on Logic, Language, and Computation, TbiLLC 2011, Kutaisi, Georgia, September 26-30, 2011 : revised selected papers (pp. 51-72). (Lecture Notes in Computer Science; Vol. 7758), (FoLLI Publications on Logic, Language and Information). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-36976-6_6[details]
Roelofsen, F., Venhuizen, N., & Sassoon, G. W. (2013). Positive and negative polar questions in discourse. In E. Chemla, V. Homer, & G. Winterstein (Eds.), Sinn und Bedeutung 17: proceedings : ENS Paris - September 8-10 2012 (pp. 455-472). semanticsarchive.net. [details]
Brasoveanu, A., Farkas, D. F., & Roelofsen, F. (2012). Polarity particles and the anatomy of N-words. In A. Aguilar-Guevara, A. Chernilovskaya, & R. Nouwen (Eds.), Proceedings of Sinn und Bedeutung 16 (Vol. 1, pp. 99-112). Cambridge, MA: MITWPL. [details]
Groenendijk, J., & Roelofsen, F. (2011). Compliance. In A. Lecomte, & S. Tronçon (Eds.), Ludics, Dialogue and Interaction: PRELUDE Project - 2006-2009 : revised selected papers (pp. 161-173). (Lecture Notes in Computer Science ; Vol. 6505), (Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence), (FoLLI Publications on Logic, Language and Information). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-19211-1_10[details]
Roelofsen, F. (2011). Algebraic foundations for inquisitive semantics. In H. van Ditmarsch, J. Lang, & S. Ju (Eds.), Logic, Rationality, and Interaction: Third International Workshop, LORI 2011, Guangzhou, China, October 10-13, 2011: proceedings (pp. 233-243). (Lecture Notes in Computer Science; Vol. 6953), (Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence), (FoLLI Publications on Logic, Language and Information). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-24130-7_17[details]
Roelofsen, F., & van Gool, S. (2010). Disjunctive questions, intonation, and highlighting. In M. Aloni, H. Bastiaanse, T. de Jager, & K. Schulz (Eds.), Logic, Language and Meaning: 17th Amsterdam Colloquium, Amsterdam, The Netherlands, December 16-18, 2009 : revised selected papers (pp. 384-394). (Lecture Notes in Computer Science; Vol. 6042), (Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence), (FoLLI Publications on Logic, Language and Information). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-14287-1_39[details]
Ciardelli, I. A., & Roelofsen, F. (2009). Generalized inquisitive logic: Completeness via intuitionistic Kripke models. In Proceedings of the 12th Conference on Theoretical Aspects of Rationality and Knowledge: California, July 06-08, 2009 (pp. 71-80). New York: ACM. https://doi.org/10.1145/1562814.1562827[details]
Ciardelli, I. A., Cornelisse, I., Groenendijk, J., & Roelofsen, F. (2009). Computing compliance. In X. He, J. Horty, & E. Pacuit (Eds.), Logic, Rationality, and Interaction: second international workshop, LORI 2009, Chongqing, China, October 8-11, 2009 : proceedings (pp. 55-65). (Lecture Notes in Computer Science; Vol. 5834), (Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence), (FoLLI Publications on Logic, Language and Information). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-04893-7_5[details]
Ciardelli, I. A., Groenendijk, J., & Roelofsen, F. (2009). Attention! 'Might' in inquisitive semantics. Proceedings from Semantics and Linguistic Theory, 19, 91-108. https://doi.org/10.3765/salt.v19i0.2520[details]
Groenendijk, J., & Roelofsen, F. (2009). Inquisitive semantics and pragmatics. In J. M. Larrazabal, & L. Zubeldia (Eds.), Meaning, content and argument: Proceedings of the ILCLI International Workshop on Semantics, Pragmatics and Rhetoric (SPR-09) (pp. 41-72). San Sebastián: Universidad del País Vasco, Servicio Editorial. [details]
Roelofsen, F. (2009). Free variable economy. SinSpeC Working Papers of the SFB 732, 05, 415-424. [details]
Brewka, G., Roelofsen, F., & Serafini, L. (2007). Contextual Default Reasoning. In M. M. Veloso (Ed.), IJCAI 2007, Proceedings of the 20th International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence (pp. 268-273). Hyderabad, India: IJCAI.
Roelofsen, F. (2007). Distributed Knowledge. Journal of Applied Non-Classical Logics, 17(2), 255-273.
2006
Roelofsen, F., & Wang, Y. (2006). Distributed Knowledge via Bisimulation Contraction. In Workshop on Belief Revision and Dynamic Logic
2005
Roelofsen, F., & Serafini, L. (2005). Minimal and Absent Information in Contexts. In International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence (pp. 558-563) [details]
Roelofsen, F., & Serafini, L. (2005). Minimality and Non-Determinism in Multi-Context Systems. In International and Interdisciplinary Conference on Modeling and Using Context (pp. 424-435) [details]
2004
Roelofsen, F., & Serafini, L. (2004). Complexity of Contextual Reasoning. In National Conference on Artificial Intelligence (pp. 118-123) [details]
Roelofsen, F., & Serafini, L. (2004). Many Hands Make Light Work: Localized Satisfiability for Multi-Context Systems. In European Conference on Artificial Intelligence (pp. 58-62) [details]
Roelofsen, F., & Serafini, L. (2004). Satisfiability for Propositional Contexts. In Principles of Knowledge Representation and Reasoning (pp. 369-376) [details]
2017
Cremers, A., van Gessel, T., & Roelofsen, F. (2017). Proceedings of the 21st Amsterdam Colloquium. Amsterdam: ILLC. [details]
Franke, M., Aloni, M. D., & Roelofsen, F. (2013). The dynamic, inquisitive, and visionary life of phi, phi?, and might phi: A Festschrift for Jeroen Groenendijk, Martin Stokhof, and Frank Veltman. Amsterdam: ILLC.
2012
Aloni, M., Kimmelman, V., Roelofsen, F., Sassoon, G. W., Schulz, K., & Westera, M. (2012). Logic, language and meaning: 18th Amsterdam Colloquium, Amsterdam, The Netherlands, December 19-21 2011: revised selected papers. (Lecture notes in computer science; Vol. 7218), (FoLLI Publications on Logic, Language and Information). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-31482-7[details]
Theiler, N. (2019). Taking a unified perspective: Resolutions and highlighting in the semantics of attitudes and particles. Amsterdam: Institute for Logic, Language and Computation. [details]
Oomen, M. & Roelofsen, F. (3-5-2023). Biased polar questions in Sign Language of the Netherlands - Annotation files. Universiteit van Amsterdam. https://doi.org/10.21942/uva.22737074.v1
Esselink, L. D., Roelofsen, F., Dotlacil, J., Mende Gillings, S., de Meulder, M., Sijm, N. & Smeijers, A. (15-3-2023). Survey Data. Universiteit van Amsterdam. https://doi.org/10.21942/uva.22280581.v2
The UvA website uses cookies and similar technologies to ensure the basic functionality of the site and for statistical and optimisation purposes. It also uses cookies to display content such as YouTube videos and for marketing purposes. This last category consists of tracking cookies: these make it possible for your online behaviour to be tracked. You consent to this by clicking on Accept. Also read our Privacy statement
Necessary
Cookies that are essential for the basic functioning of the website. These cookies are used to enable students and staff to log in to the site, for example.
Necessary & Optimalisation
Cookies that collect information about visitor behaviour anonymously to help make the website work more effectively.
Necessary & Optimalisation & Marketing
Cookies that make it possible to track visitors and show them personalised adverts. These are used by third-party advertisers to gather data about online behaviour. To watch Youtube videos you need to enable this category.