For best experience please turn on javascript and use a modern browser!
You are using a browser that is no longer supported by Microsoft. Please upgrade your browser. The site may not present itself correctly if you continue browsing.
Polarisation seems to be everywhere: in the news, on social media and at the kitchen table. But is that really the case? And is polarisation by definition harmful? In this inspiring session, Bert Bakker shows how differences of opinion and social divisions can also serve a positive purpose. Discover how a healthy dose of polarisation can contribute to a stronger and more resilient society.
Event details of Alumni Week: What if polarisation could actually be a force for connection?
Date
6 October 2026
Time
12:00 -13:00

Please note: this event is in Dutch. 

Want to join? Sign up here straight away!

Polarisation is often seen as one of the greatest challenges of our time. For example, the recent SIRE campaign “Don’t lose each other when polarisation comes close” urges people not to let their relationships come under pressure from social divisions. But is polarisation itself really the problem? In this session, Bert Bakker takes you through the latest insights from political psychology. You will discover the difference between constructive and destructive polarisation, why differences of opinion can sometimes actually contribute to social progress, and how a healthy dose of polarisation can make democracies stronger and more resilient. 

About Bert Bakker

Dr Bert Bakker is an Associate Professor in the Department of Communication Science at the University of Amsterdam and Open Science Coordinator at the University of Amsterdam. His research focuses on political psychology, with a particular emphasis on societal threat, polarisation and the role of emotions in political decision‑making.