For best experience please turn on javascript and use a modern browser!
You are using a browser that is no longer supported by Microsoft. Please upgrade your browser. The site may not present itself correctly if you continue browsing.
The UvA collaborates with many partners at home and abroad. This is a great thing, because free academic exchange leads to better science. Our globally shared scientific methods are stronger than political differences. But this freedom is not unlimited. One of the principles of the UvA as an academic institution is that we do not want to become involved in human rights violations or war crimes.

Ethical assessment of collaborations

From July 2025 employees and their supervisors can use the extensive assessment and associated assessment tools to gauge whether collaborations align with the UvA’s values. Employees can also assess the risk of collaborations contributing to human rights violations, serious damage to the environment or the misuse of knowledge for military purposes. Deans and the Executive Board can ask the Advisory Committee on Collaboration with Third Parties to investigate and advise on collaborations. 

Assessments of specific cases

More information
  • Process
    • In May 2024, an ad hoc working group of UvA experts was established to gather perspectives and input from all parts of the UvA. Following various roundtable discussions and a town hall meeting, this group presented 11 recommendations just before the summer.
    • In the meantime, no new collaborations were entered into with parties in countries and regions affected by war and conflict where serious human rights violations could occur.
    • To incorporate the working group’s recommendations into a revised assessment framework and new guidelines, the Advisory Committee on Collaboration with Third Parties took over the working group’s tasks.
    • The advisory committee was temporarily expanded to include 4 UvA experts in the fields of human rights, genocide studies, conflict studies, and international education collaboration.
    • Simultaneously, the 3 urgent cases were reviewed, and decisions on these cases have now been made.
    • The draft proposal for the updated assessment instrument was discussed with the University Committee on Research, University Committee on Education, University Committee on Valorisation and the Senate. Their feedback was incorporated into the draft.
    • The Central Works Council (COR) and the Central Student Council (CSR), which hold advisory rights beyond statutory requirements, received the draft for review in December 2024.
    • Once the representative advisory bodies have issued their advice, it will be integrated along with feedback from other university committees into a final version of the guidelines and framework. The Executive Board will then formally adopt the assessment instrument.
  • Composition of the Advisory Committee on Collaboration with Third Parties

    The new guidelines, the revised assessment framework and the recommendations on the 3 cases were drafted by the existing Advisory Committee on Collaboration with Third Parties. Specifically for this process, the Committee was recently expanded to include 4 colleagues with specialised expertise.

    Find the composition of the committee (in Dutch) on the staff website.

  • Documents and further information
More news